[Internal-cg] bylaws feedback

WUKnoben wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de
Sat Apr 30 15:11:12 UTC 2016

I'm in agreement to participate appropriatelyas ICG in the public comment.

Best regards


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- 
From: Lynn St.Amour
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2016 4:24 PM
To: Patrik Fältström
Cc: IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group ; Milton L Mueller
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] bylaws feedback

> On Apr 30, 2016, at 8:01 AM, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:
> On 30 Apr 2016, at 11:38, joseph.alhadeff wrote:
>> I am not opposed to the positions or the concerns, I am just not seeing a 
>> direct linkage to our specific transition work.  Can someone clarify the 
>> connection/dependency?
> What I see is that the implementation work is not doing what is in the 
> documents produced, but something else. As if the design process did not 
> stop when ICG/CCWG documents where done.
>   Patrik

..support and adding to Patrik’s comment, the bylaws are going beyond the 
community consensus (ICG and CCWG reports) and hence doing so without 
appropriate involvement from the full community or OCs.

Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list