[Internal-cg] bylaws feedback
Lynn at LStAmour.org
Sat Apr 30 14:24:12 UTC 2016
> On Apr 30, 2016, at 8:01 AM, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:
> On 30 Apr 2016, at 11:38, joseph.alhadeff wrote:
>> I am not opposed to the positions or the concerns, I am just not seeing a direct linkage to our specific transition work. Can someone clarify the connection/dependency?
> What I see is that the implementation work is not doing what is in the documents produced, but something else. As if the design process did not stop when ICG/CCWG documents where done.
..support and adding to Patrik’s comment, the bylaws are going beyond the community consensus (ICG and CCWG reports) and hence doing so without appropriate involvement from the full community or OCs.
More information about the Internal-cg