[Internal-cg] Part 0 v2

[Paul Wilson]

Agree with Jari - I think the text is in good shape.

All the same I’ve added a few small refinements to the numbers 
community parts. I’ve also added a bunch of new footnotes, on an 
assumption of “the more the better”.

My edits are in the dropbox here:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/vw88kaarzni31q8/transition-proposal-part0-v2-formatted-pw.docx?dl=0

Paul.


On 9 Oct 2015, at 8:26, Alissa Cooper wrote:

> Thanks. I know we did not get to discuss Part 0 on the call today, but 
> I’ve been assuming folks are mostly fine with the text given that 
> it’s been circulated on the list for awhile and I haven’t seen 
> many comments. I will incorporate the actions from today’s call and 
> circulate a complete redline in advance of people traveling to Dublin.
>
> Alissa
>
>> On Oct 8, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net> wrote:
>>
>> For what it is worth, my first read of this indicates that the text 
>> is
>> in good shape; I didn’t have any specific suggestions at this 
>> stage.
>>
>> Overall, there might be a thing or two to lift up from part 0 to
>> the executive summary once we are done. (E.g.,the part about
>> dependencies to CCWG work.) I also wonder if this is something
>> that should lead to writing the “E. ICG Recommendation” text
>> slightly differently.
>>
>> Jari
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org

________________________________________________________________________
Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC                        dg at apnic.net
http://www.apnic.net                                            @apnicdg