[Internal-cg] "Implementation"

Milton L Mueller mueller at syr.edu
Fri May 22 16:25:05 UTC 2015


No objections here. 
Based on your phrasing below I am assuming that these inquiries take the form of non-public emails to specific people rather than the operational community lists? 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf
> Of Alissa Cooper
> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 5:37 PM
> To: joseph alhadeff
> Cc: internal-cg at ianacg.org
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] "Implementation"
> 
> Note that we don't need to do serious wordsmithing here since this
> isn't text we are sending to the communities. Rather, as long as we
> agree on the sense of the questions we want to get input on, then the
> ICG reps from the various communities can communicate the
> questions and seek input however they so choose. I would expect Jari
> and myself to do this for the IETF; Paul and Alan to do it for the RIRs;
> and Martin, Milton and Xiaodong to do this for the CWG since they are
> our liaisons to that group. I agree that for the CWG we will need an
> updated estimate on how long they need to finalize their proposal in
> addition to the information about implementation.
> 
> So, if we are agreed on the sense of the questions (I've repeated the
> text with Keith's edits below), we can ask those folks to go out and
> seek the input and bring it back to us, preferably before our June 10
> call although I realize the CWG may need a bit more time to give an
> answer. Any objections to proceeding?
> 
> Thanks,
> Alissa
> 
> ---
> 
> "The ICG is gathering input about how much time the operational
> communities believe they will need to complete proposal
> development and implement the aspects of the transition proposal
> that the communities have identified as needing to be completed prior
> to the expiry of the NTIA contract (e.g., creation of new contracts,
> agreements, or entities). From start to finish, approximately how many
> weeks or months do you think your community will need to complete
> the proposal development and implementation of these aspects?"
> 
> On May 21, 2015, at 1:47 AM, joseph alhadeff
> <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> > should the last one be COMPLETE PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT AND
> NECESSARY IMPLEMENTATION STEPS?
> >
> > Joe
> >
> > On 5/21/2015 12:54 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> >> Agree, Keith, but there is a redundant "COMPLETE" in there
> >>
> >>>> "The ICG is gathering input about how much time the operational
> >>> communities believe they will need to COMPLETE PROPOSAL
> DEVELOPMENT
> >>> AND implement the aspects of the transition proposal that the
> >>> communities have identified as needing to be completed prior to
> the
> >>> expiry of the NTIA contract (e.g., creation of new contracts,
> >>> agreements, or entities). From start to finish, approximately how
> >>> many weeks or months do you think your community will need to
> >>> complete the COMPLETE PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT
> >> "complete the COMPLETE PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT".
> >>
> >> You got a bit carried away with the global search and replace, there,
> >> Keith ;-(
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Internal-cg mailing list
> >> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> >> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Internal-cg mailing list
> > Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> > http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org



More information about the Internal-cg mailing list