[Internal-cg] "Implementation"

[Manal Ismail]

Many thanks Alissa and all .. I agree with all comments ..

Thanks Alissa for the clarification that this is not a written exchange .. I initially thought it is (which I prefer) .. I thought you'll be sending an email to each of the OCs, cc'ing their ICG representatives, and was going to suggest that we attach the letter since not all OCs received it formally.. But I'm flexible ..

I also wanted to suggest that we share with the OCs a deadline for receiving their responses, in order to allow ourselves time for:
- consolidating their responses
- sharing the consolidated version with them again before sending to NTIA, if needed, and 
- responding to the NTIA before the end of June as requested 
I can see that you've already suggested June 10th in your second email ..

So , I have no objections for proceeding ..

Kind Regards
--Manal

-----Original Message-----
From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of Kavouss Arasteh
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 8:54 AM
To: Alissa Cooper
Cc: internal-cg at ianacg.org
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] "Implementation"

Alissa,
In order to avoid any potential interpretation of your question, I suggest your text begins with the citation/ quotation of the exact question asked by NTIA , by placing it between two inverted comma and  in italic  font: character  and then continue with your text Regards Kavoudd 
   

Sent from my iPhone

> On 21 May 2015, at 23:37, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in> wrote:
> 
> Note that we don’t need to do serious wordsmithing here since this isn’t text we are sending to the communities. Rather, as long as we agree on the sense of the questions we want to get input on, then the ICG reps from the various communities can communicate the questions and seek input however they so choose. I would expect Jari and myself to do this for the IETF; Paul and Alan to do it for the RIRs; and Martin, Milton and Xiaodong to do this for the CWG since they are our liaisons to that group. I agree that for the CWG we will need an updated estimate on how long they need to finalize their proposal in addition to the information about implementation.
> 
> So, if we are agreed on the sense of the questions (I’ve repeated the text with Keith’s edits below), we can ask those folks to go out and seek the input and bring it back to us, preferably before our June 10 call although I realize the CWG may need a bit more time to give an answer. Any objections to proceeding?
> 
> Thanks,
> Alissa
> 
> ---
> 
> "The ICG is gathering input about how much time the operational communities believe they will need to complete proposal development and implement the aspects of the transition proposal that the communities have identified as needing to be completed prior to the expiry of the NTIA contract (e.g., creation of new contracts, agreements, or entities). From start to finish, approximately how many weeks or months do you think your community will need to complete the proposal development and implementation of these aspects?"
> 
>> On May 21, 2015, at 1:47 AM, joseph alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com> wrote:
>> 
>> should the last one be COMPLETE PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT AND NECESSARY IMPLEMENTATION STEPS?
>> 
>> Joe
>> 
>>> On 5/21/2015 12:54 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>>> Agree, Keith, but there is a redundant "COMPLETE" in there
>>> 
>>>>> "The ICG is gathering input about how much time the operational
>>>> communities believe they will need to COMPLETE PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT 
>>>> AND implement the aspects of the transition proposal that the 
>>>> communities have identified as needing to be completed prior to the 
>>>> expiry of the NTIA contract (e.g., creation of new contracts, 
>>>> agreements, or entities). From start to finish, approximately how 
>>>> many weeks or months do you think your community will need to 
>>>> complete the COMPLETE PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT
>>> "complete the COMPLETE PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT".
>>> 
>>> You got a bit carried away with the global search and replace, 
>>> there, Keith ;-(
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org

_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org