[Internal-cg] "Implementation"

[Patrik Fältström]

I think we can handle the communication via the contact persons we have in ICG, and then each person can answer the question the way they want -- given the process they use.

Similar to the fact the letter from NTIA was in fact not sent to ICG but to us chairs.

Detail, but I think it is important to keep these "informal" communications informal, because one day we will have the need to have formal communication between the groups.

   Patrik

On 22 May 2015, at 18:25, Milton L Mueller wrote:

> No objections here.
> Based on your phrasing below I am assuming that these inquiries take the form of non-public emails to specific people rather than the operational community lists?
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf
>> Of Alissa Cooper
>> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 5:37 PM
>> To: joseph alhadeff
>> Cc: internal-cg at ianacg.org
>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] "Implementation"
>>
>> Note that we don't need to do serious wordsmithing here since this
>> isn't text we are sending to the communities. Rather, as long as we
>> agree on the sense of the questions we want to get input on, then the
>> ICG reps from the various communities can communicate the
>> questions and seek input however they so choose. I would expect Jari
>> and myself to do this for the IETF; Paul and Alan to do it for the RIRs;
>> and Martin, Milton and Xiaodong to do this for the CWG since they are
>> our liaisons to that group. I agree that for the CWG we will need an
>> updated estimate on how long they need to finalize their proposal in
>> addition to the information about implementation.
>>
>> So, if we are agreed on the sense of the questions (I've repeated the
>> text with Keith's edits below), we can ask those folks to go out and
>> seek the input and bring it back to us, preferably before our June 10
>> call although I realize the CWG may need a bit more time to give an
>> answer. Any objections to proceeding?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alissa
>>
>> ---
>>
>> "The ICG is gathering input about how much time the operational
>> communities believe they will need to complete proposal
>> development and implement the aspects of the transition proposal
>> that the communities have identified as needing to be completed prior
>> to the expiry of the NTIA contract (e.g., creation of new contracts,
>> agreements, or entities). From start to finish, approximately how many
>> weeks or months do you think your community will need to complete
>> the proposal development and implementation of these aspects?"
>>
>> On May 21, 2015, at 1:47 AM, joseph alhadeff
>> <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>>> should the last one be COMPLETE PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT AND
>> NECESSARY IMPLEMENTATION STEPS?
>>>
>>> Joe
>>>
>>> On 5/21/2015 12:54 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>>>> Agree, Keith, but there is a redundant "COMPLETE" in there
>>>>
>>>>>> "The ICG is gathering input about how much time the operational
>>>>> communities believe they will need to COMPLETE PROPOSAL
>> DEVELOPMENT
>>>>> AND implement the aspects of the transition proposal that the
>>>>> communities have identified as needing to be completed prior to
>> the
>>>>> expiry of the NTIA contract (e.g., creation of new contracts,
>>>>> agreements, or entities). From start to finish, approximately how
>>>>> many weeks or months do you think your community will need to
>>>>> complete the COMPLETE PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT
>>>> "complete the COMPLETE PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT".
>>>>
>>>> You got a bit carried away with the global search and replace, there,
>>>> Keith ;-(
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>>>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150522/e1b8f41e/attachment.asc>