[Internal-cg] Fwd: Information requested

[joseph alhadeff]

Colleagues

Perhaps we should develop a set of questions for all communities to 
answer.  I'm not sure that its appropriate to ask communities to develop 
comparative documents.

Best-

Joe
On 3/8/2015 11:00 AM, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
> Step 2 ,ICG Assessement of Cummunity proposals
> Dear Vice chair,
> May you please ask  TWO OPERATIONAL COMMUNITIES a) ProtoCOL 
> & Parameters and b) Nummbers to Kindly   provide the followings;
> A COMPARATIVE Table indicating the prcess of accountability currently 
> in force and implemented and those which will be required after 
> Transitiion.
> It would be useful to have that comparative Table enabling ICG Members 
> to better undersatnd how the accountability of Protocol Parameter and 
> Numbers are affected by Transition.
> The reports of these two communities are difficult to make such a 
> comparision.
> Without that I will have serious difficulties to comment on the 
> exacteness and appropriateness of the content of these two comminities 
> on accountability before and after transition.
> By the way, Jari promised to provide a graphic Diagram regarding 
> internal accountability being carried out by IETF
> mOREOVER, aLAN bARRET / Paul Wilson ,are respectfully requested to 
> provide similar graphic Diagram about the accountability currently in 
> force in RIRs ,in particular that RIRs have a more decentralized 
> process of five regional communities and the overall accountabilities 
> of the entire Rir s are not clear
> Rergards
>
> 2015-03-08 15:06 GMT+01:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com 
> <mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>>:
>
>     Dear Patrik
>     Thank you for reply
>     The question addressed to two operational communities represented
>     by Jari and Paul or Alan . If my request was not properly
>     formulated I hereby correct that in raising these questions and
>     seeking clarifications from protocol and numbers operational
>     communities  AND NOT to  ANY ICG MEMBER
>     Regards
>     Kavouss
>
>
>     Sent from my iPhone
>
>     On 8 Mar 2015, at 09:47, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se
>     <mailto:paf at frobbit.se>> wrote:
>
>>     All,
>>
>>     This I treat as a request from an ICG member for further
>>     explanation by other ICG members.
>>
>>        Patrik
>>
>>     Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>>     *From:* Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
>>>     <mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>>
>>>     *Date:* 8 mars 2015 08:30:25 CET
>>>     *To:* Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se <mailto:paf at frobbit.se>>,
>>>     Mohamed El Bashir <mbashir at mbash.net
>>>     <mailto:mbashir at mbash.net>>, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in
>>>     <mailto:alissa at cooperw.in>>
>>>     *Subject:* *Information requested*
>>>
>>>     À *Patrik*, *Mohamed*, Alissa, WUKnoben, ICG
>>>
>>>     Step 2 ,ICG Assessement of Cummunity proposals
>>>     Dear Vice chair,
>>>     May you please ask Jari and Alan Barret or Paul Wilson to
>>>     provide the foloowings;
>>>     A COMPARATIVE Table indicating the prcess of accountability
>>>     currently in force and implemented and those which will be
>>>     required after Transitiion.
>>>     It would be useful to have that comparative Table enabling ICG
>>>     Members to better undersatnd how the accountability of Protocol
>>>     Parameter and Numbers are affected by Transition.
>>>     The reports of these two communities are difficult to make such
>>>     a comparision.
>>>     Without that I will have serious difficulties to comment on the
>>>     exacteness and appropriateness of the content of these two
>>>     comminities on accountability before and after transition.
>>>     By the way, Jari promised to provide a graphic Diagram regarding
>>>     internal accountability being carried out by IETF
>>>     mOREOVER, aLAN bARRET / Paul Wilson ,are respectfully requested
>>>     to provide similar graphic Diagram about the accountability
>>>     currently in force in RIRs ,in particular that RIRs have a more
>>>     decentralized process of five regional communities and the
>>>     overall accountabilities of the entire  Rir s are not clear
>>>     Rergards
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Internal-cg mailing list
>>     Internal-cg at ianacg.org <mailto:Internal-cg at ianacg.org>
>>     http://ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at ianacg.org
> http://ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150308/bfcbcaaf/attachment.html>