[Internal-cg] Fwd: Information requested

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Step 2 ,ICG Assessement of Cummunity proposals
Dear Vice chair,
May you please ask  TWO OPERATIONAL COMMUNITIES a) ProtoCOL & Parameters
and b) Nummbers to Kindly   provide the followings;
A COMPARATIVE Table indicating the prcess of accountability currently in
force and implemented and those which will be required after Transitiion.
It would be useful to have that comparative Table enabling ICG Members to
better undersatnd how the accountability of Protocol Parameter and Numbers
are affected by Transition.
The reports of these two communities are difficult to make such a
comparision.
Without that I will have serious difficulties to comment on the exacteness
and appropriateness of the content of these two comminities on
accountability before and after transition.
By the way, Jari promised to provide a graphic Diagram regarding internal
accountability being carried out by IETF
mOREOVER, aLAN bARRET / Paul Wilson ,are respectfully requested to provide
similar graphic Diagram about the accountability currently in force in RIRs
,in particular  that RIRs have a more decentralized process of five
regional communities and the overall accountabilities of the entire  Rir s
are not clear
Rergards

2015-03-08 15:06 GMT+01:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>:

> Dear Patrik
> Thank you for reply
> The question addressed to two operational communities represented by Jari
> and Paul or Alan . If my request was not properly formulated I hereby
> correct that in raising these questions and seeking clarifications from
> protocol and numbers operational communities  AND NOT to  ANY ICG MEMBER
> Regards
> Kavouss
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 8 Mar 2015, at 09:47, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> This I treat as a request from an ICG member for further explanation by
> other ICG members.
>
>    Patrik
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From:* Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
> *Date:* 8 mars 2015 08:30:25 CET
> *To:* Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se>,  Mohamed El Bashir <
> mbashir at mbash.net>, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>
> *Subject:* *Information requested*
>
> À *Patrik*, *Mohamed*, Alissa, WUKnoben, ICG
> Step 2 ,ICG Assessement of Cummunity proposals
> Dear Vice chair,
> May you please ask Jari and Alan Barret or Paul Wilson to provide the
> foloowings;
> A COMPARATIVE Table indicating the prcess of accountability currently in
> force and implemented and those which will be required after Transitiion.
> It would be useful to have that comparative Table enabling ICG Members to
> better undersatnd how the accountability of Protocol Parameter and Numbers
> are affected by Transition.
> The reports of these two communities are difficult to make such a
> comparision.
> Without that I will have serious difficulties to comment on the exacteness
> and appropriateness of the content of these two comminities on
> accountability before and after transition.
> By the way, Jari promised to provide a graphic Diagram regarding internal
> accountability being carried out by IETF
> mOREOVER, aLAN bARRET / Paul Wilson ,are respectfully requested to provide
> similar graphic Diagram about the accountability currently in force in RIRs
> ,in particular  that RIRs have a more decentralized process of five
> regional communities and the overall accountabilities of the entire  Rir s
> are not clear
> Rergards
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at ianacg.org
> http://ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150308/11cfac3b/attachment.html>