[Internal-cg] "Alternatives"

Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de
Sun Jun 28 16:33:58 UTC 2015


Thanks Paul, this interpretation meets my capabiltlity of expression in English.

Wolf-Ulrich

Sent from my personal phone

> Am 27.06.2015 um 07:18 schrieb Paul Wilson <pwilson at apnic.net>:
> 
> Re
> 
>> IF you considered other alternatives, WHY did you decide against them?
> 
> I am happy with this option.
> 
> 
>> On 26 Jun 2015, at 3:34, Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de wrote:
>> I wonder whether we shouldn't question the communities, in case they considered alternative models, 1. Which were the principles laid down to guide them and 2. What was the decisive point for the option they have chosen.
> 
> This sounds a *little* too prescriptive for me, in terms of the answer we are looking for.
> 
> Perhaps what Wolf-Unrich is asking for could be expressed as:
> 
> “IF you considered other alternatives, WHY and HOW did you decide against them?”
> 
> Which I’d be ok with as well.
> 
> Paul.
> 


More information about the Internal-cg mailing list