[Internal-cg] Thoughts on proposal assessments
Alissa Cooper
alissa at cooperw.in
Thu Jul 9 19:01:19 UTC 2015
On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:19 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> NB: It is not within our remit to decide whether CCWG output satisfies the
>> CWG's dependencies. That is up to the CWG. Our job is to produce a sound
>
> That's precisely why the CWG proposal is not complete until they have seen, reviewed and accepted the final proposal of the CCWG.
>
>> and consistent deliverable with a public record about its development. In
>> fact I advise strongly against formally taking note of CCWG's output while we
>> do our work. That part is not our job and we should not waste time
>
> This is mistaken because the CCWG's work (workstream 1) will be formally incorporated into the CWG proposal.
> NTIA has made it clear that they are basically part of the same proposal, and we are responsible for sending them to NTIA.
I do not believe that is the plan actually. I thought they will remain two separate documents and while they will both be transmitted to NTIA via the ICANN Board, they will not be incorporated into a single document or even necessarily transmitted at the same time or in the same communication between the Board and NTIA.
Alissa
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
More information about the Internal-cg
mailing list