[Internal-cg] Contracting

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Wolf
Thank you reply
Do you think that they are incapable to raise their concerns ?
At the maximum those représentatives of these two communities may send
thier views and not ICG IN TOTO.
tHIS NOTE WAS NOT AGREED AND DOES NOT REFLECT THE CONSENSUS
IT IS DANGEROUS  PRECEDENCE THAT WE START TO TAKE A POSITION AT THIS STAGE
OF COMMENTING PERIOD
REGARDS
Kavouss

2015-04-29 20:23 GMT+02:00 Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu>:

>  Hi, Kavouss,
>
> Again, it’s a process issue, we are making a statement about how the
> bottom up transition process should work.
>
> We are not acting on behalf of protocol or numbers communities. It’s just
> that because those two communities have already turned in their proposal
> (which names has not) they are the first to discover the process problems.
> If names had turned in their proposal first and had encountered these
> problems I am sure we would be proposing the same thing.
>
>
>
> I am having trouble understanding your resistance to this.
>
>
>
> *From:* Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Kavouss Arasteh
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 29, 2015 2:00 PM
> *To:* Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
> *Cc:* internal-cg at ianacg.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Internal-cg] Contracting
>
>
>
> Dear Wolf, Please kindly read my comments .I agree with the issue burt I
> have difficulties to accept why ICG becomes spokeman of the Two Communities
> while the draft is on commenting period and every one including those two
> communities may raise any concerns but not in the name of ICG.
>
> We are not caretaker of Protocol and numbers commujnities.
>
> Such mission is not given in our charetr to us.
>
> We should remain neuteral visd a vis all three communities and not as an
> altering entity for any communities.
>
> They are expert, matured and well informed.
>
> We have not recieved any thing from CWG .
>
> Tks
>
> Regards
>
> Kavouss
>
>
>
> 2015-04-29 18:59 GMT+02:00 Wolf-Ulrich Knoben <wuknoben at gmail.com>:
>
>  I also agree to Alissa's draft. I wonder whether it shouldn't read
> "...including ICANN staff and board..."
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150429/940a37d8/attachment.html>