[Internal-cg] Contracting

[Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de]

Dear Kavouss,

I understand also ICG commenting from a perspective taking into consideration all the three communities providing proposals. Each of  these 3 elements is important to be prepared for fitting together. Thus I think ICG has a responsibility to take care about. If there is a feeling that our target may be endangered due to the treatment of one of the elements we should mention this.
Best regards 
Wolf-Ulrich 

Sent from my personal phone

> Am 29.04.2015 um 19:59 schrieb Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>:
> 
> Dear Wolf, Please kindly read my comments .I agree with the issue burt I have difficulties to accept why ICG becomes spokeman of the Two Communities while the draft is on commenting period and every one including those two communities may raise any concerns but not in the name of ICG.
> We are not caretaker of Protocol and numbers commujnities.
> Such mission is not given in our charetr to us.
> We should remain neuteral visd a vis all three communities and not as an altering entity for any communities.
> They are expert, matured and well informed.
> We have not recieved any thing from CWG .
> Tks
> Regards
> Kavouss  
> 
> 2015-04-29 18:59 GMT+02:00 Wolf-Ulrich Knoben <wuknoben at gmail.com>:
>> I also agree to Alissa's draft. I wonder whether it shouldn't read "...including ICANN staff and board..."
>> 
>> Best regards
>> 
>> Wolf-Ulrich
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150429/e323b4a3/attachment.html>