[Internal-cg] Proposal approval and agenda for call #26

[Patrik Fältström]

I read what you and Martin write. I just do not want ICG to inject itself in decision making process of the CWG.

CWG could have waited with sending their letter until CCWG proposal was approved, but they did not.

   Patrik

On 1 Mar 2016, at 0:32, Mueller, Milton L wrote:

> I agree with Martin.
> The CWG says that its proposal is dependent on the CCWG and until the CCWG is done the CWG is not done and we are not done.
> We gain nothing by jumping the gun
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of
>> Martin Boyle
>> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 2:32 PM
>> To: Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>
>> Cc: IANA etc etcCoordination Group <internal-cg at ianacg.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Proposal approval and agenda for call #26
>>
>> Hi Alissa,
>>
>> Surely the accountability requirements will only be met if the CCWG-
>> Accountability proposal is adopted?  Until then it is a conditional agreement:
>> if the draft proposal were to be adopted, it would meet the CWG-
>> Stewardship's requirements.  Put another way, if one or more Chartering
>> Organisation were to reject (or, for that matter, the ICANN Board refused to
>> adopt) there is no CCWG-Accountability proposal and therefore the
>> conditionality has not been met.
>>
>> We'll look silly if we send in the proposal a day or so before one of the
>> Chartering Organisations rejected the draft...
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Alissa Cooper [mailto:alissa at cooperw.in]
>> Sent: 29 February 2016 17:59
>> To: Martin Boyle <Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk>
>> Cc: IANA etc etcCoordination Group <internal-cg at ianacg.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Proposal approval and agenda for call #26
>>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>>> On Feb 29, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Martin Boyle <Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Don't we need to wait for the Chartering Organisations to adopt?
>>
>> No. The ICG proposal is explicit about this (on the front page and in every
>> highlighted section). What we were waiting for was the CWG’s confirmation,
>> and we received that. Our proposal was not conditioned on any action by the
>> chartering organizations.
>>
>> Alissa
>>
>>> Many a slip and all that...  It is only a draft until then.  The CWG-Stewardship
>> endorsement is an important, but not a complete, condition.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of
>> Alissa Cooper
>>> Sent: 29 February 2016 16:48
>>> To: IANA etc etcCoordination Group <internal-cg at ianacg.org>
>>> Subject: [Internal-cg] Proposal approval and agenda for call #26
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> We have received confirmation from the CWG that the CCWG proposal
>> meets its requirements. Therefore, we are now in a position to approve our
>> final proposal for transmission to NTIA via the ICANN Board. The final
>> proposal, with edits made to the sections that previously referenced the
>> CWG-CCWG dependency, is attached to this message in redline and clean
>> form. They are also available on Dropbox:
>>>
>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/0lzepe727bxqz20/IANA-transition-proposal-
>> v10.docx?dl=0
>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/j65tohvyy59ellt/IANA-transition-proposal-
>> v10-clean.docx?dl=0
>>>
>>> We will ask for the ICG’s approval of this final version on our March 1 call
>> (12:00 UTC). Here is the proposed agenda for the call:
>>>
>>> 1. Approval of final transition proposal 2. Update on communications plans
>>>
>>> Feedback on the agenda is welcome.
>>>
>>> Alissa
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20160301/905a324e/attachment.asc>