[Internal-cg] Proposal approval and agenda for call #26

Mueller, Milton L milton at gatech.edu
Mon Feb 29 23:32:58 UTC 2016

It's clear who has to move first, or move next: the CCWG and its chartering organizations.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of Jari
> Arkko
> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 5:39 PM
> To: Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>
> Cc: IANA etc etcCoordination Group <internal-cg at ianacg.org>
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Proposal approval and agenda for call #26
> I think we can complete our part and move on.
> If our requirements have been fulfilled, we can observe them and indeed
> move on.
> There are also practical considerations; in a system with multiple approvers
> and no atomic transactions, someone may have to move first. Doesn't mean
> that we couldn't come back if something later happens in the chartering
> organisations, the ICANN board, or NTIA. And as long as we say our
> requirements have been fulfilled but do not pretend that this is the end of
> the overall process, we are fine.
> Jari

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list