[Internal-cg] Proposal approval and agenda for call #26

[James M. Bladel]

I agree with Martin.  Like the ICG, other chartering organizations were
also seeking confirmation from CWG-Stewardship that CCWG-Accountablity met
their dependencies as a component of their review & approval of the
CCWG-Accoutnablity report.

J.


On 2/29/16, 13:32 , "Internal-cg on behalf of Martin Boyle"
<internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org on behalf of Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk>
wrote:

>Hi Alissa,
>
>Surely the accountability requirements will only be met if the
>CCWG-Accountability proposal is adopted?  Until then it is a conditional
>agreement:  if the draft proposal were to be adopted, it would meet the
>CWG-Stewardship's requirements.  Put another way, if one or more
>Chartering Organisation were to reject (or, for that matter, the ICANN
>Board refused to adopt) there is no CCWG-Accountability proposal and
>therefore the conditionality has not been met.
>
>We'll look silly if we send in the proposal a day or so before one of the
>Chartering Organisations rejected the draft...
>
>Martin 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alissa Cooper [mailto:alissa at cooperw.in]
>Sent: 29 February 2016 17:59
>To: Martin Boyle <Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk>
>Cc: IANA etc etcCoordination Group <internal-cg at ianacg.org>
>Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Proposal approval and agenda for call #26
>
>Hi Martin,
>
>> On Feb 29, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Martin Boyle <Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk>
>>wrote:
>> 
>> Don't we need to wait for the Chartering Organisations to adopt?
>
>No. The ICG proposal is explicit about this (on the front page and in
>every highlighted section). What we were waiting for was the CWG¹s
>confirmation, and we received that. Our proposal was not conditioned on
>any action by the chartering organizations.
>
>Alissa
>
>> Many a slip and all that...  It is only a draft until then.  The
>>CWG-Stewardship endorsement is an important, but not a complete,
>>condition.
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of
>>Alissa Cooper
>> Sent: 29 February 2016 16:48
>> To: IANA etc etcCoordination Group <internal-cg at ianacg.org>
>> Subject: [Internal-cg] Proposal approval and agenda for call #26
>> 
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> We have received confirmation from the CWG that the CCWG proposal meets
>>its requirements. Therefore, we are now in a position to approve our
>>final proposal for transmission to NTIA via the ICANN Board. The final
>>proposal, with edits made to the sections that previously referenced the
>>CWG-CCWG dependency, is attached to this message in redline and clean
>>form. They are also available on Dropbox:
>> 
>> 
>>https://www.dropbox.com/s/0lzepe727bxqz20/IANA-transition-proposal-v10.do
>>cx?dl=0
>> 
>>https://www.dropbox.com/s/j65tohvyy59ellt/IANA-transition-proposal-v10-cl
>>ean.docx?dl=0
>> 
>> We will ask for the ICG¹s approval of this final version on our March 1
>>call (12:00 UTC). Here is the proposed agenda for the call:
>> 
>> 1. Approval of final transition proposal 2. Update on communications
>>plans
>> 
>> Feedback on the agenda is welcome.
>> 
>> Alissa
>> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>Internal-cg mailing list
>Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org