[Internal-cg] UPDATE - ICG Call: Doodle for March teleconference

Wed Feb 10 21:20:39 UTC 2016

Dear Alissa
Pls find a below the CCWG TIME LINE THAT SOME OF YOU HAVE CERTAINLY SEEN
However, I thought it would be useful to refresh the mind of every one

*Message from **Thomas, Mathieu, Leon *

*Dear all, *

* As discussed on the CCWG-Accountability call yesterday, we have put
together a proposed timeline outlining the phases of our work to finalize
the WS1 Report. We plan to share this timeline more broadly with the
Chartering Organizations, the CWG-Stewardship, and the ICG, so that these
groups can plan their approval schedules as well. *

*Please note that the three last dates are in square brackets since they
have yet to be confirmed by the dependent parties. We discussed these dates
during a Transition Program Facilitation meeting yesterday (the recording
is available here
<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/transition-facilitation-2015-09-23-en>),
but we wanted to differentiate them from the dates for which we, in the
CCWG-Accountability, have direct control over. We will also offer the Board
an opportunity to submit a statement confirming that gaps have been
addressed, since this may be useful to the Chartering Organizations as they
consider the final report. *

   - *10 Feb — Complete editing of major sections (staff, leadership, legal
   counsel)*
   - *11 Feb — Finalize text, cross check and assemble draft package
   (staff)*
   - *12 Feb —
   Draft completed, final package review and ready for CCWG Leadership
Team review.
   Staff will send the package to CCWG Leadership Team and CCWG Legal Counsel
   by 2200 UTC. *
   - *15 Feb — Incorporate edits from CCWG Leadership Team and Legal
   (staff)*
   - *16 Feb —  Staff will send draft package to CCWG for 48 hr review*
   - *17 Feb --- Minority Statements due so they can be incorporated
into report.
   If the Board wishes to submit a statement or comment confirming
   that gaps have been addressed, then this would be the due date for that
   statement. *
   - *18 Feb --- v4 draft finalized and sent to Chartering Organizations (this
   will include publication on the ICANN website and associated
   communications)*
   - *[25 Feb --- CWG-Stewardship sign-off letter delivered
   to Chartering Organizations]*
   -
   *[8 Mar --- Sign-off by Chartering Organizations at ICANN55 in Marrakech]*
   - *[10 Mar --- Hand over from ICANN Board to NTIA]*

*Please send through any comments on the proposed timeline, and let us know
should you have any suggestions or additions. *

* Best,  *
*Thomas, Mathieu, Leon *
I wish to inform my ICG colleagues that the works of CCWG has
almost finished, See time line
Calls 82 and  83 were instrumental.
At call 82 every thing was blocked because of divergence views on Rec. 11 (
Stress Test 18) towards the end of the call 82 , two complementary
comnpromise
Two dedicated calls were organized to discuss the complementary packaged
compropmiosed
At the send dedicated call the package was almost agreed with some
improvement  to the initial package
At CALL 83, 09 Feb in the general call the amended / improved packge was
consensend
Now we have time line
We need to take necessary action in our formal letter to CWG to ask them
,if their requirements are fully met.
This question w should raise on 18 February, See Time lione.
I leave the rest for the co-chairs and the rest of ICG
I am terribly tired as worked during the last three months almost 212-14
hours per day .
Now I have to continue until the propoval is definitively finalized. there
are still a lot of readings and compromise
I an Keith made  OUR UTMOST efforts to fully represent ICG? INTEREST
 Regards
Kavouss

2016-02-09 19:27 GMT+01:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>:

> Dear Jennifer,
> Thank you very much for the message,$
> Any of the three days is good .if the call is
>
> 11:00 – 12:00
>
> 12:00 – 13:00
>
> 13:00 – 14:00
>
> Pls note that I and Keith are expected to report on the outcome of CCWG
>
> Regards
>
> Kavouss
>
> 2016-02-09 19:08 GMT+01:00 Jennifer Chung <jen at icgsec.asia>:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>>
>>
>> Per Alissa, extra days and extra time slots have been added to the doodle
>> (18 options) link below:
>>
>>
>>
>> http://doodle.com/poll/h98bi8ks44432552
>>
>>
>>
>> For those who have already participated in the doodle, please take a look
>> to fill out the expanded choices – if you have any questions, please let me
>> know and I’ll be happy to assist.
>>
>>
>>
>> For your reference, the time slot choices are now as follows (all times
>> UTC):
>>
>>
>>
>> Monday, February 29
>>
>> 03:00 – 04:00
>>
>> 04:00 – 05:00
>>
>> 05:00 – 06:00
>>
>> 11:00 – 12:00
>>
>> 12:00 – 13:00
>>
>> 13:00 – 14:00
>>
>>
>>
>> Tuesday, March 1
>>
>> 03:00 – 04:00
>>
>> 04:00 – 05:00
>>
>> 05:00 – 06:00
>>
>> 11:00 – 12:00
>>
>> 12:00 – 13:00
>>
>> 13:00 – 14:00
>>
>>
>>
>> Wednesday, March 2
>>
>> 03:00 – 04:00
>>
>> 04:00 – 05:00
>>
>> 05:00 – 06:00
>>
>> 11:00 – 12:00
>>
>> 12:00 – 13:00
>>
>> 13:00 – 14:00
>>
>>
>>
>> Responses by Tuesday, February 16 are very much appreciated!
>>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Jennifer
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] *On Behalf
>> Of *Alissa Cooper
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 9, 2016 11:13 AM
>> *To:* Joseph Alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com>
>> *Cc:* internal-cg at ianacg.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [Internal-cg] ICG Call: Doodle for March teleconference
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, let’s go ahead and add Feb 29 and March 2 to the doodle. Jennifer,
>> could you do that?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Alissa
>>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 9, 2016, at 3:35 AM, Joseph Alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Since there is no real magic on any one day, if the poll does not
>> generate a critical mass perhaps we should consider more than one day?
>>
>> On 2/9/2016 5:49 AM, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>>
>> Dear Jennifer,
>>
>> 05,00 - 06,00 is much better than the two others, otherwise I will not be
>> able to attend as that would be a bad window for me.
>>
>> KAVOUSS
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2016-02-09 6:13 GMT+01:00 Jennifer Chung <jen at icgsec.asia>:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>>
>>
>> Per Alissa, please find the doodle link below for the March 1 ICG call:
>>
>>
>>
>> http://doodle.com/poll/h98bi8ks44432552
>>
>>
>>
>> For your reference, the time slot choices are as follows (all times UTC):
>>
>>
>>
>> Tuesday, March 1
>>
>> 03:00 - 04:00
>>
>> 04:00 - 05:00
>>
>> 05:00 - 06:00
>>
>>
>>
>> Responses by Tuesday, February 16 are very much appreciated!
>>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Jennifer
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] *On Behalf
>> Of *Alissa Cooper
>> *Sent:* Monday, February 8, 2016 12:01 PM
>> *To:* IANA etc etcCoordination Group <internal-cg at ianacg.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Internal-cg] [CCWG-ACCT] Update on Timeline for
>> Chartering Org Approval of WS1 Recommendations
>>
>>
>>
>> It seems most (though not all) ICG members who expressed an opinion about
>> this are ok with this course of action, so we will proceed.
>>
>>
>>
>> Secretariat: please send a doodle poll so we can choose a time for a call
>> on March 1.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Alissa
>>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 3, 2016, at 12:48 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Please take a look at the message below from the CCWG list as well as the
>> formal statement from the co-chairs here:
>> https://www.icann.org/news/blog/leading-into-marrakech-an-update-from-the-ccwg-accountability-co-chairs
>>
>>
>>
>> The CCWG is aiming to have its proposal ready for the chartering
>> organizations to approve it before or during ICANN 55. In light of this,
>> Mohamed, Patrik and I believe the ICG needs to do the following:
>>
>>
>>
>> (1) Plan to ask the CWG for confirmation that their requirements are met
>> as soon as the CCWG proposal goes to the chartering orgs, and give the CWG
>> a heads-up that we intend to do that so they can respond promptly.
>>
>>
>>
>> (2) Schedule an ICG call for March 1. Hopefully we will have heard back
>> from the CWG by then and we can discuss approval of our final proposal
>> then, but it will be before anyone is in transit to Marrakesh. We do not
>> have to wait for the chartering orgs to finish our business. If the
>> timeline slips, we can cancel this call when it gets closer to the date.
>> (Alternatively we could confirm approval of our final proposal strictly via
>> email, but I am assuming folks would prefer to do so on a call.)
>>
>>
>>
>> I would also like to ask the group to reconsider the idea of scheduling a
>> conference call at the end of the ICANN week, if we can find a time with
>> interpreter availability. If the CCWG timeline does slip a bit such that we
>> have not yet gotten a response from the CWG by March 1, I do not want the
>> ICG to be in a position of causing any additional delay. If we schedule a
>> call at the end of the ICANN week to discuss approval of our final
>> proposal, we have less risk of doing that. Otherwise it may get bumped to
>> the week following ICANN 55, even if the CCWG proposal gets forwarded to
>> the ICANN Board during the meeting. I firmly believe that every single day
>> matters at this point.
>>
>>
>>
>> Your thoughts on all of the above are much appreciated.
>>
>>
>>
>> Alissa
>>
>>
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>
>>
>> *Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] TR: Update on Timeline for Chartering Org Approval
>> of WS1 Recommendations*
>>
>> *Date: *February 2, 2016 at 11:53:16 PM PST
>>
>> *To: *"CCWG Accountability" <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Colleagues,
>>
>>
>>
>> Please find below for your information the note sent today to the
>> Chartering Organization chairs, in line with our discussions during our
>> meeting #82.
>>
>>
>>
>> This will be added to our correspondence section of the wiki.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Mathieu
>>
>>
>>
>> *De :* Mathieu Weill [mailto:weill at afnic.fr <weill at afnic.fr>]
>> *Envoyé :* mercredi 3 février 2016 08:52
>> *À :* 'James Bladel'; 'Byron Holland'; 'Louis Lee'; 'Alan Greenberg';
>> 'Thomas Schneider'; 'Lars-Johan Liman'; 'Tripti Sinha'; 'Patrik Fältström';
>> 'Alissa Cooper'; 'Mohamed El Bashir'; 'Jonathan Robinson'; 'Lise Fuhr'
>> *Cc :* 'David Olive'; 'Steve Crocker'; 'Bruce Tonkin'; 'Theresa
>> Swinehart'; 'Thomas Rickert'; 'León Felipe Sánchez Ambía'; 'ACCT-STAFF'
>> *Objet :* Update on Timeline for Chartering Org Approval of WS1
>> Recommendations
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>>
>>
>> Yesterday, the co-Chairs issued a formal statement
>> <https://www.icann.org/news/blog/leading-into-marrakech-an-update-from-the-ccwg-accountability-co-chairs> updating
>> the community on the status of the Work Stream 1 Recommendations and
>> providing insight into the steps the CCWG-Accountability will be taking in
>> developing the supplemental draft.
>>
>>
>>
>> Our hope is that the majority of changes from the Third Draft Report will
>> relate to specificities of implementation rather than content, and as such,
>> an additional public comment period will not be necessary before approval
>> by the Chartering Organizations.
>>
>>
>>
>> In light of progress made and in assessing the outstanding issues, we
>> have announced a target to distribute the supplemental report to our
>> Chartering Organizations in time for consideration and approval on all Work
>> Stream 1 Recommendations during ICANN55 in Marrakech.
>>
>>
>>
>> The various SOs and ACs approach their work and schedules differently and
>> we are respectfully asking that you take this into account as you plan your
>> discussions before and during ICANN55.
>>
>> With that said, we encourage any Chartering Organizations that can
>> deliberate and/or approve the Work Stream 1 Recommendations prior to
>> Marrakech to please do so.
>>
>>
>>
>> We are grateful for your input on the Third Draft Report and for your
>> continued engagement in the development of the revised Work Stream 1
>> Recommendations. We hope to continue this open dialogue as the supplemental
>> report is finalized, and we are also hoping that all potential issues have
>> been raised to the CCWG-Accountability so they can be mitigated in our
>> revisions. Our objective is to provide the Chartering Organizations a
>> simple and straightforward approval process.
>>
>>
>>
>> Following approval from the Chartering Organizations, we have asked the
>> ICANN Board to be mindful of the timeline as they plan their review period
>> of the Work Stream 1 Recommendations and submission to NTIA.
>>
>>
>>
>> We have seen increased involvement from the ICANN Board as our work
>> progressed since the Third Draft Report. By enabling us to understand Board
>> comments in real-time, the following potential global public interest
>> concerns stemming from the Board’s comments in December, have been
>> discussed:
>>
>>    - Inspection rights have been fully addressed.
>>    - Budget process concerns have been fully addressed.
>>    - Work Stream 2 concerns have been fully addressed.
>>    - Human rights concerns have been discussed and the group has
>>    adjusted its recommendation, however Board concerns still exist.
>>    - Concerns on ICANN’s Mission are still being discussed.
>>
>> As always, please not hesitate to reach out to us should you have any
>> questions or concerns.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Mathieu, Thomas, León
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>>
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20160210/efcd0adf/attachment.html>