[Internal-cg] UPDATE - ICG Call: Doodle for March teleconference

Tue Feb 9 18:27:21 UTC 2016

Dear Jennifer,
Thank you very much for the message,$
Any of the three days is good .if the call is

11:00 – 12:00

12:00 – 13:00

13:00 – 14:00

Pls note that I and Keith are expected to report on the outcome of CCWG

Regards

Kavouss

2016-02-09 19:08 GMT+01:00 Jennifer Chung <jen at icgsec.asia>:

> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Per Alissa, extra days and extra time slots have been added to the doodle
> (18 options) link below:
>
>
>
> http://doodle.com/poll/h98bi8ks44432552
>
>
>
> For those who have already participated in the doodle, please take a look
> to fill out the expanded choices – if you have any questions, please let me
> know and I’ll be happy to assist.
>
>
>
> For your reference, the time slot choices are now as follows (all times
> UTC):
>
>
>
> Monday, February 29
>
> 03:00 – 04:00
>
> 04:00 – 05:00
>
> 05:00 – 06:00
>
> 11:00 – 12:00
>
> 12:00 – 13:00
>
> 13:00 – 14:00
>
>
>
> Tuesday, March 1
>
> 03:00 – 04:00
>
> 04:00 – 05:00
>
> 05:00 – 06:00
>
> 11:00 – 12:00
>
> 12:00 – 13:00
>
> 13:00 – 14:00
>
>
>
> Wednesday, March 2
>
> 03:00 – 04:00
>
> 04:00 – 05:00
>
> 05:00 – 06:00
>
> 11:00 – 12:00
>
> 12:00 – 13:00
>
> 13:00 – 14:00
>
>
>
> Responses by Tuesday, February 16 are very much appreciated!
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Jennifer
>
>
>
> *From:* Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Alissa Cooper
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 9, 2016 11:13 AM
> *To:* Joseph Alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com>
> *Cc:* internal-cg at ianacg.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Internal-cg] ICG Call: Doodle for March teleconference
>
>
>
> Yes, let’s go ahead and add Feb 29 and March 2 to the doodle. Jennifer,
> could you do that?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alissa
>
>
>
> On Feb 9, 2016, at 3:35 AM, Joseph Alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Since there is no real magic on any one day, if the poll does not generate
> a critical mass perhaps we should consider more than one day?
>
> On 2/9/2016 5:49 AM, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>
> Dear Jennifer,
>
> 05,00 - 06,00 is much better than the two others, otherwise I will not be
> able to attend as that would be a bad window for me.
>
> KAVOUSS
>
>
>
>
>
> 2016-02-09 6:13 GMT+01:00 Jennifer Chung <jen at icgsec.asia>:
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Per Alissa, please find the doodle link below for the March 1 ICG call:
>
>
>
> http://doodle.com/poll/h98bi8ks44432552
>
>
>
> For your reference, the time slot choices are as follows (all times UTC):
>
>
>
> Tuesday, March 1
>
> 03:00 - 04:00
>
> 04:00 - 05:00
>
> 05:00 - 06:00
>
>
>
> Responses by Tuesday, February 16 are very much appreciated!
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Jennifer
>
>
>
> *From:* Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Alissa Cooper
> *Sent:* Monday, February 8, 2016 12:01 PM
> *To:* IANA etc etcCoordination Group <internal-cg at ianacg.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Internal-cg] [CCWG-ACCT] Update on Timeline for
> Chartering Org Approval of WS1 Recommendations
>
>
>
> It seems most (though not all) ICG members who expressed an opinion about
> this are ok with this course of action, so we will proceed.
>
>
>
> Secretariat: please send a doodle poll so we can choose a time for a call
> on March 1.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alissa
>
>
>
> On Feb 3, 2016, at 12:48 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in> wrote:
>
>
>
> Please take a look at the message below from the CCWG list as well as the
> formal statement from the co-chairs here:
> https://www.icann.org/news/blog/leading-into-marrakech-an-update-from-the-ccwg-accountability-co-chairs
>
>
>
> The CCWG is aiming to have its proposal ready for the chartering
> organizations to approve it before or during ICANN 55. In light of this,
> Mohamed, Patrik and I believe the ICG needs to do the following:
>
>
>
> (1) Plan to ask the CWG for confirmation that their requirements are met
> as soon as the CCWG proposal goes to the chartering orgs, and give the CWG
> a heads-up that we intend to do that so they can respond promptly.
>
>
>
> (2) Schedule an ICG call for March 1. Hopefully we will have heard back
> from the CWG by then and we can discuss approval of our final proposal
> then, but it will be before anyone is in transit to Marrakesh. We do not
> have to wait for the chartering orgs to finish our business. If the
> timeline slips, we can cancel this call when it gets closer to the date.
> (Alternatively we could confirm approval of our final proposal strictly via
> email, but I am assuming folks would prefer to do so on a call.)
>
>
>
> I would also like to ask the group to reconsider the idea of scheduling a
> conference call at the end of the ICANN week, if we can find a time with
> interpreter availability. If the CCWG timeline does slip a bit such that we
> have not yet gotten a response from the CWG by March 1, I do not want the
> ICG to be in a position of causing any additional delay. If we schedule a
> call at the end of the ICANN week to discuss approval of our final
> proposal, we have less risk of doing that. Otherwise it may get bumped to
> the week following ICANN 55, even if the CCWG proposal gets forwarded to
> the ICANN Board during the meeting. I firmly believe that every single day
> matters at this point.
>
>
>
> Your thoughts on all of the above are much appreciated.
>
>
>
> Alissa
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>
>
> *From: *Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>
>
> *Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] TR: Update on Timeline for Chartering Org Approval
> of WS1 Recommendations*
>
> *Date: *February 2, 2016 at 11:53:16 PM PST
>
> *To: *"CCWG Accountability" <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
>
>
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
>
>
> Please find below for your information the note sent today to the
> Chartering Organization chairs, in line with our discussions during our
> meeting #82.
>
>
>
> This will be added to our correspondence section of the wiki.
>
>
>
> Best
>
> Mathieu
>
>
>
> *De :* Mathieu Weill [mailto:weill at afnic.fr <weill at afnic.fr>]
> *Envoyé :* mercredi 3 février 2016 08:52
> *À :* 'James Bladel'; 'Byron Holland'; 'Louis Lee'; 'Alan Greenberg';
> 'Thomas Schneider'; 'Lars-Johan Liman'; 'Tripti Sinha'; 'Patrik Fältström';
> 'Alissa Cooper'; 'Mohamed El Bashir'; 'Jonathan Robinson'; 'Lise Fuhr'
> *Cc :* 'David Olive'; 'Steve Crocker'; 'Bruce Tonkin'; 'Theresa
> Swinehart'; 'Thomas Rickert'; 'León Felipe Sánchez Ambía'; 'ACCT-STAFF'
> *Objet :* Update on Timeline for Chartering Org Approval of WS1
> Recommendations
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> Yesterday, the co-Chairs issued a formal statement
> <https://www.icann.org/news/blog/leading-into-marrakech-an-update-from-the-ccwg-accountability-co-chairs> updating
> the community on the status of the Work Stream 1 Recommendations and
> providing insight into the steps the CCWG-Accountability will be taking in
> developing the supplemental draft.
>
>
>
> Our hope is that the majority of changes from the Third Draft Report will
> relate to specificities of implementation rather than content, and as such,
> an additional public comment period will not be necessary before approval
> by the Chartering Organizations.
>
>
>
> In light of progress made and in assessing the outstanding issues, we have
> announced a target to distribute the supplemental report to our Chartering
> Organizations in time for consideration and approval on all Work Stream 1
> Recommendations during ICANN55 in Marrakech.
>
>
>
> The various SOs and ACs approach their work and schedules differently and
> we are respectfully asking that you take this into account as you plan your
> discussions before and during ICANN55.
>
> With that said, we encourage any Chartering Organizations that can
> deliberate and/or approve the Work Stream 1 Recommendations prior to
> Marrakech to please do so.
>
>
>
> We are grateful for your input on the Third Draft Report and for your
> continued engagement in the development of the revised Work Stream 1
> Recommendations. We hope to continue this open dialogue as the supplemental
> report is finalized, and we are also hoping that all potential issues have
> been raised to the CCWG-Accountability so they can be mitigated in our
> revisions. Our objective is to provide the Chartering Organizations a
> simple and straightforward approval process.
>
>
>
> Following approval from the Chartering Organizations, we have asked the
> ICANN Board to be mindful of the timeline as they plan their review period
> of the Work Stream 1 Recommendations and submission to NTIA.
>
>
>
> We have seen increased involvement from the ICANN Board as our work
> progressed since the Third Draft Report. By enabling us to understand Board
> comments in real-time, the following potential global public interest
> concerns stemming from the Board’s comments in December, have been
> discussed:
>
>    - Inspection rights have been fully addressed.
>    - Budget process concerns have been fully addressed.
>    - Work Stream 2 concerns have been fully addressed.
>    - Human rights concerns have been discussed and the group has adjusted
>    its recommendation, however Board concerns still exist.
>    - Concerns on ICANN’s Mission are still being discussed.
>
> As always, please not hesitate to reach out to us should you have any
> questions or concerns.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Mathieu, Thomas, León
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Internal-cg mailing list
>
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20160209/0bc5776c/attachment.html>