[Internal-cg] Fwd: [CCWG-ACCT] Update on Timeline for Chartering Org Approval of WS1 Recommendations

Joseph Alhadeff joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com
Thu Feb 4 14:36:57 UTC 2016

Dear Kavouss:

Thanks for the clarification and your continued reporting to us on the 
developments as they occur.



On 2/4/2016 9:18 AM, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
> Dear Joe,
> Thank you very much for comments
> Nevertheless, there are issues that we, the ICG Liaison may bring to 
> your attention resulted from Supplement Report .As you know CCWG has 
> scheduled a f2f meeting on 04 March in Marrakesh. It would be good to 
> reflect on the supplement and we, the Liaisons report back the ICG 
> comments.
> By the way the extraordinary/ devoted call for REC 11( and its impact 
> on Recs 1 and 2)was held today at 12,00 UTC, This meeting favorably 
> considered the compromise package that I had submitted( jointly 
> prepared by me and Beckie Burr) .That compromise is being posted on 
> CCWG wikie / mailing list and Chartering Organizations are requested 
> to provide their final comment for another call scheduled on Monday 08 
> Feb
> Regards
> Kavouss
> 2016-02-04 14:25 GMT+01:00 Joseph Alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com 
> <mailto:joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com>>:
>     I'm fine with scheduling a call when you guys feel we are best
>     positioned to have the answer of CWG.  That being said, I'm not
>     sure what if any deliberation is needed if CWG says that their
>     dependencies are satisfied.
>     Joe
>     On 2/4/2016 2:12 AM, Narelle Clark wrote:
>>     The ICG certainly does not want to be the source of any delay.
>>     I thought we were going to schedule a call for both before and
>>     after ICANN55?
>>     Then cancel or keep as applies.
>>     Narelle
>>     *From:*Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] *On
>>     Behalf Of *Alissa Cooper
>>     *Sent:* Thursday, 4 February 2016 7:48 AM
>>     *To:* IANA etc etcCoordination Group
>>     *Subject:* [Internal-cg] Fwd: [CCWG-ACCT] Update on Timeline for
>>     Chartering Org Approval of WS1 Recommendations
>>     Please take a look at the message below from the CCWG list as
>>     well as the formal statement from the co-chairs here:
>>     https://www.icann.org/news/blog/leading-into-marrakech-an-update-from-the-ccwg-accountability-co-chairs
>>     The CCWG is aiming to have its proposal ready for the chartering
>>     organizations to approve it before or during ICANN 55. In light
>>     of this, Mohamed, Patrik and I believe the ICG needs to do the
>>     following:
>>     (1) Plan to ask the CWG for confirmation that their requirements
>>     are met as soon as the CCWG proposal goes to the chartering orgs,
>>     and give the CWG a heads-up that we intend to do that so they can
>>     respond promptly.
>>     (2) Schedule an ICG call for March 1. Hopefully we will have
>>     heard back from the CWG by then and we can discuss approval of
>>     our final proposal then, but it will be before anyone is in
>>     transit to Marrakesh. We do not have to wait for the chartering
>>     orgs to finish our business. If the timeline slips, we can cancel
>>     this call when it gets closer to the date. (Alternatively we
>>     could confirm approval of our final proposal strictly via email,
>>     but I am assuming folks would prefer to do so on a call.)
>>     I would also like to ask the group to reconsider the idea of
>>     scheduling a conference call at the end of the ICANN week, if we
>>     can find a time with interpreter availability. If the CCWG
>>     timeline does slip a bit such that we have not yet gotten a
>>     response from the CWG by March 1, I do not want the ICG to be in
>>     a position of causing any additional delay. If we schedule a call
>>     at the end of the ICANN week to discuss approval of our final
>>     proposal, we have less risk of doing that. Otherwise it may get
>>     bumped to the week following ICANN 55, even if the CCWG proposal
>>     gets forwarded to the ICANN Board during the meeting. I firmly
>>     believe that every single day matters at this point.
>>     Your thoughts on all of the above are much appreciated.
>>     Alissa
>>     Begin forwarded message:
>>     *From: *Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
>>     <mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>>
>>     *Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] TR: Update on Timeline for Chartering Org
>>     Approval of WS1 Recommendations*
>>     *Date: *February 2, 2016 at 11:53:16 PM PST
>>     *To: *"CCWG Accountability"
>>     <accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>>     <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>>
>>     Dear Colleagues,
>>     Please find below for your information the note sent today to the
>>     Chartering Organization chairs, in line with our discussions
>>     during our meeting #82.
>>     This will be added to our correspondence section of the wiki.
>>     Best
>>     Mathieu
>>     *De :*Mathieu Weill [mailto:weill at afnic.fr]
>>     *Envoyé :*mercredi 3 février 2016 08:52
>>     *À :*'James Bladel'; 'Byron Holland'; 'Louis Lee'; 'Alan
>>     Greenberg'; 'Thomas Schneider'; 'Lars-Johan Liman'; 'Tripti
>>     Sinha'; 'Patrik Fältström'; 'Alissa Cooper'; 'Mohamed El Bashir';
>>     'Jonathan Robinson'; 'Lise Fuhr'
>>     *Cc :*'David Olive'; 'Steve Crocker'; 'Bruce Tonkin'; 'Theresa
>>     Swinehart'; 'Thomas Rickert'; 'León Felipe Sánchez Ambía';
>>     'ACCT-STAFF'
>>     *Objet :*Update on Timeline for Chartering Org Approval of WS1
>>     Recommendations
>>     Dear all,
>>     Yesterday, the co-Chairs issued aformal statement
>>     <https://www.icann.org/news/blog/leading-into-marrakech-an-update-from-the-ccwg-accountability-co-chairs>updating
>>     the community on the status of the Work Stream 1 Recommendations
>>     and providing insight into the steps the CCWG-Accountability will
>>     be taking in developing the supplemental draft.
>>     Our hope is that the majority of changes from the Third Draft
>>     Report will relate to specificities of implementation rather than
>>     content, and as such, an additional public comment period will
>>     not be necessary before approval by the Chartering Organizations.
>>     In light of progress made and in assessing the outstanding
>>     issues, we have announced a target to distribute the supplemental
>>     report to our Chartering Organizations in time for consideration
>>     and approval on all Work Stream 1 Recommendations during ICANN55
>>     in Marrakech.
>>     The various SOs and ACs approach their work and schedules
>>     differently and we are respectfully asking that you take this
>>     into account as you plan your discussions before and during ICANN55.
>>     With that said, we encourage any Chartering Organizations that
>>     can deliberate and/or approve the Work Stream 1 Recommendations
>>     prior to Marrakech to please do so.
>>     We are grateful for your input on the Third Draft Report and for
>>     your continued engagement in the development of the revised Work
>>     Stream 1 Recommendations. We hope to continue this open dialogue
>>     as the supplemental report is finalized, and we are also hoping
>>     that all potential issues have been raised to the
>>     CCWG-Accountability so they can be mitigated in our revisions.
>>     Our objective is to provide the Chartering Organizations a simple
>>     and straightforward approval process.
>>     Following approval from the Chartering Organizations, we have
>>     asked the ICANN Board to be mindful of the timeline as they plan
>>     their review period of the Work Stream 1 Recommendations and
>>     submission to NTIA.
>>     We have seen increased involvement from the ICANN Board as our
>>     work progressed since the Third Draft Report. By enabling us to
>>     understand Board comments in real-time, the following potential
>>     global public interest concerns stemming from the Board’s
>>     comments in December, have been discussed:
>>       * Inspection rights have been fully addressed.
>>       * Budget process concerns have been fully addressed.
>>       * Work Stream 2 concerns have been fully addressed.
>>       * Human rights concerns have been discussed and the group has
>>         adjusted its recommendation, however Board concerns still exist.
>>       * Concerns on ICANN’s Mission are still being discussed.
>>     As always, please not hesitate to reach out to us should you have
>>     any questions or concerns.
>>     Best regards,
>>     Mathieu, Thomas, León
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>     Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>     <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Internal-cg mailing list
>>     Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org <mailto:Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org>
>>     http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>     _______________________________________________
>     Internal-cg mailing list
>     Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org <mailto:Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org>
>     http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20160204/b1388ece/attachment.html>

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list