[Internal-cg] bylaws feedback

[Kavouss Arasteh]

À *Thomas*, *León*, Patrik, Holly, Rosemary, Mathieu, Milton, Lynn, IANA
Dear All,
It is surprising that after so many messages and so many weaning still
ICANN  LEGAL DEPARETMENT oir Lawyers of Snidely and Adler insist to have
cross reference to unknown and unwritten documents.
It is legally inappropriate and wrong to provide a anklet overgraze to some
documents the constant of which is unknown'
Rgis is against the very interest of ICG\
Regards
Kavouss

2016-04-30 21:04 GMT+02:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>:

> Dear All,
> It is surprising that after so many messages and so many weaning still
> ICANN  LEGAL DEPARETMENT oir Lawyers of Snidely and Adler insist to have
> cross reference to unknown and unwritten documents.
> It is legally inappropriate and wrong to provide a anklet overgraze to
> some documents the constant of which is unknown'
> Rgis is against the very interest of ICG
>
> 2016-04-30 19:20 GMT+02:00 Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se>:
>
>> On 30 Apr 2016, at 17:16, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
>>
>> > The only answer I saw to this was that we don’t need to worry about it
>> because the PTI contract will be put up for public comment.
>>
>> A public comment period should not be The Mechanism that is used to
>> ensure the proposal stays within the realm of the documents produced. The
>> process followed to create the bylaws must include validation mechanisms to
>> minimize deviation.
>>
>>    Patrik
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20160430/22840b82/attachment.html>