[Internal-cg] FW: Please find attached revised summary proposal

[joseph alhadeff]

Milton:

I am fine with the suggestion, if others are OK.. Recall that they 
yellow was to see if there was a needed cross reference to other 
sections that might address the issue more fully.  I recall that a 
question had been raised at the meeting, perhaps by Kavouss, questioning 
the assertion related to voting in the CSC being a real issue due to 
issues being resolved in parallel workstreams...

Joe

On 9/26/2015 11:14 AM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
>
> Joe,
>
> I would like to suggest some improvements in  the paragraph on the 
> NTIA criterion pertaining to governments.
>
> You wrote:
>
> A range of comments addressed the role of governments.  Among the most 
> relevant: a couple felt that government roles would be too constrained 
> and they would not be able to fulfill all of the criteria of the Tunis 
> Agenda; a couple also highlighted a concern for the possible role 
> future legislation by US government based on concern of jurisdiction; 
> and more commentators focused on what they perceived to be a possible 
> enhanced voting role for the GAC and concerns of governments as owners 
> of ccTLDs in the CSC.  The proposal cannot address all hypothetical 
> situations and has relied on the community processes to find the right 
> balance across the stakeholder equities and operational requirements.  
> The ICG sees no further action as appropriate at this point, but notes 
> the concerns raised.
>
> I would propose to replace this paragraph with the following statement:
>
> The overwhelming majority of comments agreed that the proposal does 
> not replace NTIA stewardship with a government-led or 
> intergovernmental solution. Some comments felt that governmental roles 
> would be too constrained; others felt that the role of the U.S. 
> government was still too strong due to the retention of U.S. 
> jurisdiction. A few other commentators expressed concerns about the 
> role of government-controlled ccTLDs in the CSC. The ICG notes the 
> concerns raised, but believes that the proposal has relied on the 
> community processes to find the right balance across the stakeholder 
> equities and operational requirements, and thus sees no further action 
> as needed.
>
> A small number of comments expressed concern about the strengthening 
> of the GAC in the new accountability arrangements. The ICG notes that 
> insofar as they justify changes in the proposal, these comments are 
> best addressed by the CCWG on enhanced accountability.
>
> *From:*Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] *On Behalf 
> Of *Jennifer Chung
> *Sent:* Friday, September 25, 2015 1:58 PM
> *To:* internal-cg at ianacg.org
> *Subject:* [Internal-cg] FW: Please find attached revised summary proposal
>
> FYI please see the email from Joe below with the attached proposed text.
>
> *From:*joseph alhadeff [mailto:joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, September 25, 2015 1:47 PM
> *To:* Jennifer Chung <jen at icgsec.asia <mailto:jen at icgsec.asia>>
> *Subject:* Fwd: Please find attached revised summary proposal
>
> FYI
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>
> *Subject: *
>
> 	
>
> Please find attached revised summary proposal
>
> *Date: *
>
> 	
>
> Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:49:09 -0400
>
> *From: *
>
> 	
>
> joseph alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com> 
> <mailto:joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com>
>
> *Organization: *
>
> 	
>
> Oracle Corporation
>
> *To: *
>
> 	
>
> internal-cg at icann.org <mailto:internal-cg at icann.org> 
> <internal-cg at icann.org> <mailto:internal-cg at icann.org>
>
> Please note that I found no cross reference in our proposal to the role
> of government as multistakeholder participant that would address the
> concern raised that such participation may bee seen as at odds with the
> NTIA criteria.  I have tried to raise an innocuous addition as a
> footnote to deal with the concern in a neutral fashion.  I have
> highlighted it in red to facilitate ease of comment.  Those topics
> highlighted in yellow are possible places where other more specific work
> may supersede this language and be replaced by a cross reference.  There
> is one margin question as well.
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150926/7c88fc2f/attachment.html>