[Internal-cg] OC roles during implementation phase

Alissa Cooper alissa at cooperw.in
Fri Sep 11 17:16:45 UTC 2015


Hi Kavouss,

My responses are in-line below.

> On Sep 11, 2015, at 3:40 AM, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Alissa
> I id not understand the purpose of your proposal?

The purpose is to get an update from the OCs about what they plan for their roles to be during the implementation phase of the transition.

> Are you opening a new opportunity to gave additional comments than those
> received ?

No.

> Why?
> Are you planning to override the established procedure which was nit foreseen in our work Plan   ?

No.

Best,
Alissa

> Until  I receive  the clear cut valid reasons  as foreseen in our charter,I disagree and oppose to that proposal.
> As you know I was unable to attend the last  call  .
> Regards
> Kavouss
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On 10 Sep 2015, at 21:58, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I have a request to make as a follow-up to something I said on the recent call. I think it would be useful for the ICG to understand if the OCs have an idea of what they expect their role to be during the proposal implementation phase. If we could get that information from the OC reps before the F2F, I think it would help facilitate our discussion of what the ICG role should be, if any. So I’d like to ask Jari, Paul, Alan, Martin, Wolf-Ulrich, and Milton if you could provide whatever information is available along these lines from your respective OCs. I realize that on the one hand some implementation work is already ongoing and on the other hand the OCs may not have discussed their own roles much, so whatever information you feel is appropriate to provide would be appreciated.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Alissa
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org




More information about the Internal-cg mailing list