[Internal-cg] OC roles during implementation phase
Kavouss Arasteh
kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Fri Sep 11 10:40:18 UTC 2015
Dear Alissa
I id not understand the purpose of your proposal?
Are you opening a new opportunity to gave additional comments than those
received ?
Why?
Are you planning to override the established procedure which was nit foreseen in our work Plan ?
Until I receive the clear cut valid reasons as foreseen in our charter,I disagree and oppose to that proposal.
As you know I was unable to attend the last call .
Regards
Kavouss
Sent from my iPhone
> On 10 Sep 2015, at 21:58, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a request to make as a follow-up to something I said on the recent call. I think it would be useful for the ICG to understand if the OCs have an idea of what they expect their role to be during the proposal implementation phase. If we could get that information from the OC reps before the F2F, I think it would help facilitate our discussion of what the ICG role should be, if any. So I’d like to ask Jari, Paul, Alan, Martin, Wolf-Ulrich, and Milton if you could provide whatever information is available along these lines from your respective OCs. I realize that on the one hand some implementation work is already ongoing and on the other hand the OCs may not have discussed their own roles much, so whatever information you feel is appropriate to provide would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Alissa
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
More information about the Internal-cg
mailing list