[Internal-cg] DRAFT message from the ICG Chairs to the CCWGChairs

[Drazek, Keith]

Agreed. Or pull in the previously submitted language from the IAB's 2 public comment submissions.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 23, 2015, at 8:12 PM, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:
> 
> Wolf-Ulrich is correct, giving the CCWG an open-ended letter that says "something is wrong" won't be perceived as actionable. 
> 
> I would suggest replacing this text " We have no interest in telling ICANN what belongs in the mission statement, but..." with something along the lines of "We think that there is the potential for incompatibilities or conflicts between the mission statement as it now stands and later efforts by the protocols or numbers communities to revise their IFO arrangements."
> 
> Perhaps the IAB could prepare a memo about what they think needs to be changed and it could accompany our letter.
> 
> --MM
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: WUKnoben [mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de]
>> 
>> Mission and core values revisions were already part of the 2nd CCWG draft
>> (see 159 ff) and changes are suggested.
>> In addition "Development and approval of all necessary changes to ICANN by-
>> laws" are items listed under "Implementation" (V) of the proposal to be
>> completed.
>> 
>> For me this letter doesn't make sense unless we specify outstanding items
>> either in terms of content or timing.
>> 
>> Best regards
>> 
>> Wolf-Ulrich
>> 
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> From: Russ Housley
>> Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 7:23 PM
>> To: Mueller, Milton L
>> Cc: ICG Group
>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] DRAFT message from the ICG Chairs to the
>> CCWGChairs
>> 
>> Milton:
>> 
>> I thought about that, but I was reacting to the point made by Keith that the
>> real drafting of bylaws has not really begun yet.  So, at this stage, the right
>> thing to do seems to be coordination.
>> 
>> Russ
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Oct 23, 2015, at 1:11 PM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
>>> 
>>> Wouldn't it be better to specifically identify what parts of the
>>> mission statement are incorrect, or even to suggest ways to fix them?
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf
>>>> Of Russ Housley
>>>> Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 11:38 AM
>>>> To: ICG Group <internal-cg at ianacg.org>
>>>> Subject: [Internal-cg] DRAFT message from the ICG Chairs to the CCWG
>>>> Chairs
>>>> 
>>>> Please review this draft text for the message from the ICG Chairs to
>>>> the CCWG
>>>> chairs:
>>>> 
>>>> Russ
>>>> 
>>>> = = = = = = = =
>>>> 
>>>> Dear CCWG Chairs,
>>>> 
>>>> During our discussions in Dublin, the ICG recognized that the mission
>>>> statement in the ICANN Bylaws will be out of date as the
>>>> CWG-Stewardship and CCWG-Accountability proposals are implemented.
>>>> This is especially important since the mission statement is intended
>>>> to become a fundamental bylaw.  We have no interest in telling ICANN
>>>> what belongs in the mission statement, but we do believe that the
>>>> mission statement must accurately reflect the ICANN organizational
>>>> scope and structure.  The ICG asks the CCWG make the ICANN mission
>>>> statement current and accurate before it becomes a fundamental bylaw.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for your consideration,
>>>> ICG Chairs
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>>>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>