[Internal-cg] RES: Possible

[michael niebel]

Yes, Joe, it would.

>From a systematic point of view: are we positioning also other issues with
regard to the question whether they are "considered  as a limiting factor
to the consideration of the  proposal" ?

Michael

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 7:50 AM, joseph alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com
> wrote:

> overall.  Would that word as a modifier to comments address the
> confusion?  the majority of overall comments...
>
> On 10/22/2015 6:47 AM, michael niebel wrote:
>
> Agree. Just one question: does the last sentence " The majority of
> comments .." mean the majority of comments that raised the jurisdiction
> issue or the overall majority of comments ?
> Michael
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Jandyr Ferreira dos Santos Junior <
> <jandyr.santos at itamaraty.gov.br>jandyr.santos at itamaraty.gov.br> wrote:
>
>> Likewise.
>>
>> Joe's text is accurate and does not predetermine the scope of the
>> discussion on jurisdiction post-transition.
>>
>>
>> Jandyr
>> ________________________________________
>> De: Internal-cg [internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] em nome de Drazek,
>> Keith [kdrazek at verisign.com]
>> Enviado: quinta-feira, 22 de outubro de 2015 8:30
>> Para: joseph alhadeff; internal-cg at ianacg.org
>> Assunto: Re: [Internal-cg] Possible
>>
>> I support Joe's proposed jurisdiction language below. It is factual and
>> does not seek to predetermine the scope of discussion post-transition.
>>
>> Keith
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of
>> joseph alhadeff
>> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:20 AM
>> To: internal-cg at ianacg.org
>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Possible
>>
>> Possible text on Jurisdiction:
>>
>> A number of comments highlighted the issue of Jurisdiction as important.
>> A minority objected to any transition at all because they perceived that US
>> was relinquishing jurisdiction.  Another minority point of view raised
>> concerns that the jurisdiction was not international or outside of the US.
>> A number of comments also suggested that CCWG Workstream 2 might be a place
>> to address some of the continued
>> concerns about jurisdiction.    The majority of comments did not find
>> jurisdiction as a limiting factor to the consideration proposal.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20151022/29757252/attachment.html>