[Internal-cg] RES: Possible

[joseph alhadeff]

overall.  Would that word as a modifier to comments address the 
confusion?  the majority of overall comments...

On 10/22/2015 6:47 AM, michael niebel wrote:
> Agree. Just one question: does the last sentence " The majority of 
> comments .." mean the majority of comments that raised the 
> jurisdiction issue or the overall majority of comments ?
> Michael
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Jandyr Ferreira dos Santos Junior 
> <jandyr.santos at itamaraty.gov.br 
> <mailto:jandyr.santos at itamaraty.gov.br>> wrote:
>
>     Likewise.
>
>     Joe's text is accurate and does not predetermine the scope of the
>     discussion on jurisdiction post-transition.
>
>
>     Jandyr
>     ________________________________________
>     De: Internal-cg [internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org
>     <mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org>] em nome de Drazek, Keith
>     [kdrazek at verisign.com <mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com>]
>     Enviado: quinta-feira, 22 de outubro de 2015 8:30
>     Para: joseph alhadeff; internal-cg at ianacg.org
>     <mailto:internal-cg at ianacg.org>
>     Assunto: Re: [Internal-cg] Possible
>
>     I support Joe's proposed jurisdiction language below. It is
>     factual and does not seek to predetermine the scope of discussion
>     post-transition.
>
>     Keith
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org
>     <mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org>] On Behalf Of joseph alhadeff
>     Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:20 AM
>     To: internal-cg at ianacg.org <mailto:internal-cg at ianacg.org>
>     Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Possible
>
>     Possible text on Jurisdiction:
>
>     A number of comments highlighted the issue of Jurisdiction as
>     important.  A minority objected to any transition at all because
>     they perceived that US was relinquishing jurisdiction.  Another
>     minority point of view raised concerns that the jurisdiction was
>     not international or outside of the US.  A number of comments also
>     suggested that CCWG Workstream 2 might be a place to address some
>     of the continued
>     concerns about jurisdiction.    The majority of comments did not find
>     jurisdiction as a limiting factor to the consideration proposal.
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Internal-cg mailing list
>     Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org <mailto:Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org>
>     http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Internal-cg mailing list
>     Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org <mailto:Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org>
>     http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>     _______________________________________________
>     Internal-cg mailing list
>     Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org <mailto:Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org>
>     http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20151022/fd224736/attachment.html>