[Internal-cg] Continuing / Re-Chartering Thoughts

[Daniel Karrenberg]

I did not hear universal support for actively reaching out. I heard some
people say explicitly that the initiative should not come from us. I for
one find such outreach rather pathetic and weakening our credibility. If
I am the really only one then fine. So if noone else speaks up I will
drop that particular point.

Daniel

On 19.10.15 10:30 , joseph alhadeff wrote:
> Daniel:
> 
> I think the concept was that we could reach out to see if an
> implementation role for us was needed, with Jean-Jacques suggesting it
> needed to be a canvass of all communities, not just OCs.   I concur that
> the validation of implementation work had to be external, not
> self-determined.
> 
> Joe
> 
> On 10/18/2015 9:22 AM, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
>>
>> On 18.10.15 14:50 , Subrenat, Jean-Jacques wrote:
>>> ... in this morning's discussion I felt there was a majority view in
>>> favour of reaching out to our communities. ...
>> It did not feel like that to me. I heard quite a few people say that the
>> initiative would have to come from outside. I listened quite carefully
>> even though I admit to be handicapped by not being in the room.
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>