[Internal-cg] Q&As also for engagement session

[Joseph Alhadeff]

I understand our role to exist until the acceptance of the proposal not just its submission.  But in that time only NTIA would be in a position of sending it back to us for specific work...   Any other scenario does not serve the collective interests of the stakeholders who sent us here.... Agree with Jean-Jacques that I hope not to find out...

Joe

Sent from my iPad

> On Oct 18, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 18.10.15 17:01 , Subrenat, Jean-Jacques wrote:
>> 
>> Are we really prepared -and more importantly, does our mandate allow/require us- to CHANGE the Transition Plan AFTER we have sent it to the NTIA?
> 
> Jean-Jaques,
> 
> There is a scenario where NTIA might suggest changes to us and via us to
> the OCs. If the OCs react to that and make changes to their input to us
> I consider it to be within our current mandate and charter to apply the
> same process we have used thus far to produce a revised proposal. In my
> mind this is very much more clearly in our mandate than playing a role
> in implementation. In fact I see little alternatives to using the ICG
> process to make any such revisions should they be required.
> 
> I consider this an unlikely, yet possible scenario. I hope very much
> that this scenario will not occur.
> 
> Hence I have not adapted the language. If this remains an issue I would
> welcome alternative words.
> 
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 
>> Jean-Jacques.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Mail original -----
>> De: "Daniel Karrenberg" <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net>
>> À: "IANA etc etc Coordination Group" <Internal-cg at ianacg.org>
>> Envoyé: Dimanche 18 Octobre 2015 12:56:28
>> Objet: [Internal-cg] Q&As also for engagement session
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Here are a few suggestions for Q&As as requested by Alissa. They seem
>> straightforward to me and useful for tomorrow. Could we hear support?
>> 
>> 
>> Q: When will the ICG proposal be ready?
>> 
>> A: We expect publish our final draft of the proposal in the coming few
>> weeks. We will then seek confirmation from the CWG that their
>> requirements regarding ICANN accountability have been met by the
>> parallel accountability process (CCWG). In the meantime anyone can use
>> the final draft in preparing for the time when we will submit it.
>> 
>> 
>> Q: What is the status of the final draft of the proposal.
>> 
>> A: It is the result of the ICG process as far as ICG is concerned. ICG
>> does not plan to make any revisions out of its own accord.
>> 
>> 
>> Q: When will ICG submit the proposal to NTIA?
>> 
>> A: We will communicate the proposal to the ICANN board for transmission
>> to NTIA as soon as we have confirmation from the CWG that their
>> requirements regarding ICANN accountability have been met. As to when
>> exactly this will be, please ask the CWG.
>> 
>> 
>> Q: What will the ICG do between now and the end of the transition?
>> 
>> A: We expect publish our final draft of the proposal in the next few
>> weeks. We will seek confirmation from the CWG that their requirements
>> regarding ICANN accountability have been met by the parallel
>> accountability process (CCWG). Once we have that confirmation we will
>> submit the proposal and be available for some time to answer possible
>> queries about the proposal. This would complete our mandate.
>> 
>> We have no plans to do anything else. If there were widely supported
>> requests to extend our mandate and charter we would of course discuss
>> them. If there were any requests from the OCs to change the proposal we
>> would be available to coordinate this as we have done until now.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org