[Internal-cg] Continuing / Re-Chartering Thoughts
Subrenat, Jean-Jacques
jjs at dyalog.net
Sun Oct 18 10:46:51 UTC 2015
Alan & All,
in line with my remarks on this subject (yesterday and this morning), I suggest we send a single message to ALL our communities, not differentiating OCs and non-OCs. Reason: whereas I agree that implementation will be carried out by the OCs, the consequences of implementation will affect ALL our communities. And this would be consistent with our Charter provisions, which I referred to this morning.
Jean-Jacques.
----- Mail original -----
De: "Alan Barrett" <apb at cequrux.com>
À: "IANA etc etc Coordination Group" <Internal-cg at ianacg.org>
Envoyé: Dimanche 18 Octobre 2015 11:42:28
Objet: Re: [Internal-cg] Continuing / Re-Chartering Thoughts
On Sun, 18 Oct 2015, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
> I understand that some want us to stay around to keep everyone,
> specifically ICANN, honest during implementation.
>
> Our current charter does not cover this. This requires a
> re-charter. Something like "Regularly compile information
> about the state of the transition and report it to the Internet
> community."
I believe that it would make sense for the ICG to have some sort
of monitoring and reporting role during implementation. Something
like ticking off items on a to-do list and publishing the status.
However, I think that that is outside the ICG's charter, so the
ICG should not unilaterally take that role.
> If the OCs actually manage to ask us to do this as a group or
> with coordinated language it would be strong evidence of their
> ability to coordinate.
>
> Would this be a way forward?
If the OCs were to ask the ICG to do that, then it would probably be OK.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
More information about the Internal-cg
mailing list