[Internal-cg] proposed text

Daniel Karrenberg daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Sat Oct 17 15:38:53 UTC 2015


of course. i must have read over it one time short of seeing that ;-)
also i am not married to the exact words. this is the content of what i
propose we say.


On 17.10.15 15:56 , Paul Wilson wrote:
> On 17 Oct 2015, at 23:54, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
>> We should say something like this.
>>
>> In the proposal we should say: "Coordination between the OCs needs to
>> continue. During the development of the proposal the OCs have committed
>> to continued coordination among themselves concerning the IANA. The ICG
>> believes that no additional mechanisms for coordination are not needed.
> 
> I don’t suppose you intend the double-negative here.
> 
> Should it be:
> 
> “no additional mechanisms for coordination are needed”
> 
>> For a description of historic and current coordination mechanisms please
>> see Annex C."
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> 



More information about the Internal-cg mailing list