[Internal-cg] proposed text

[Paul Wilson]

On 17 Oct 2015, at 23:54, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
> We should say something like this.
>
> In the proposal we should say: "Coordination between the OCs needs to
> continue. During the development of the proposal the OCs have committed
> to continued coordination among themselves concerning the IANA. The ICG
> believes that no additional mechanisms for coordination are not needed.

I don’t suppose you intend the double-negative here.

Should it be:

“no additional mechanisms for coordination are needed”

> For a description of historic and current coordination mechanisms please
> see Annex C."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org