[Internal-cg] Part 0 v2

[Paul Wilson]

All good for me, thanks Alissa.


On 10 Oct 2015, at 4:46, Alissa Cooper wrote:

> Hi Paul,
>
> Thanks. I have some questions and comments on some of your edits.
>
> Footnote 14: seeing as the numbers proposal and the other two 
> proposals are included verbatim in the document, I think it’s 
> confusing to cite the version hosted at nro.net <http://nro.net/>. We 
> do not have similar footnotes for the other two proposals. So I’d 
> prefer to leave this out.
>
> Para 13: I think the point about coordination is a good addition, but 
> I’m not sure it belongs in the summary of the proposal. I’d like 
> to move it down into the interoperability section.
>
> Thanks,
> Alissa
>
>> On Oct 8, 2015, at 6:44 PM, Paul Wilson <pwilson at apnic.net> wrote:
>>
>> Agree with Jari - I think the text is in good shape.
>>
>> All the same I’ve added a few small refinements to the numbers 
>> community parts. I’ve also added a bunch of new footnotes, on an 
>> assumption of “the more the better”.
>>
>> My edits are in the dropbox here:
>>
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/vw88kaarzni31q8/transition-proposal-part0-v2-formatted-pw.docx?dl=0
>>
>> Paul.
>>
>>
>> On 9 Oct 2015, at 8:26, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks. I know we did not get to discuss Part 0 on the call today, 
>>> but I’ve been assuming folks are mostly fine with the text given 
>>> that it’s been circulated on the list for awhile and I haven’t 
>>> seen many comments. I will incorporate the actions from today’s 
>>> call and circulate a complete redline in advance of people traveling 
>>> to Dublin.
>>>
>>> Alissa
>>>
>>>> On Oct 8, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> For what it is worth, my first read of this indicates that the text 
>>>> is
>>>> in good shape; I didn’t have any specific suggestions at this 
>>>> stage.
>>>>
>>>> Overall, there might be a thing or two to lift up from part 0 to
>>>> the executive summary once we are done. (E.g.,the part about
>>>> dependencies to CCWG work.) I also wonder if this is something
>>>> that should lead to writing the “E. ICG Recommendation” text
>>>> slightly differently.
>>>>
>>>> Jari
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>>>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>>
>> ________________________________________________________________________
>> Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC                        
>> dg at apnic.net
>> http://www.apnic.net                                            
>> @apnicdg

________________________________________________________________________
Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC                        dg at apnic.net
http://www.apnic.net                                            @apnicdg