[Internal-cg] Action M6: 19

[Patrik Fältström]

I am working down the list of action points for the chairs...

M6: 19  Chairs to draft text summarizing comments about compatibility/interoperability for the summary document.

When ICG investigated comments related to interoperability between the proposals, we found two general trends. The first that comments that pointed out difficulties related to interoperability in general were against the whole transition, and not against interoperability per se. The second that comments pointed out the internal ICANN structure with PTI as a separate entity would make cooperation and collaboration with the numbers and protocol parameters communities harder. Both of these communities have though explicitly said themselves they will have arrangements with ICANN, and how ICANN is implementing the solution is completely up to ICANN. It is for example expected that IETF will continue to require (and get) direct relationship with staff at IANA function to participate in the IETF PDP regardless of how ICANN is restructuring itself due to the result of the CWG work.

Another issue brought up is related to the IPR related to IANA, which has concluded in interoperable suggestions from the communities, which is described elsewhere.

In general, comments did point out the proposals are interoperable, in part because they are not dependent on each other except in the cases mentioned above.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20151006/5b54cd81/attachment.asc>