paf at frobbit.se
Sun May 24 02:33:58 UTC 2015
On 23 May 2015, at 11:21, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
> What you want is just what you want.
> I do not understand you and nor agreed that any ICG either co chairs or individual member impose his or het views to the entire ICG.
Dear Kavouss, no one have suggested that either. We have our consensus process that we have agreed to.
> We need to have a coordinated and harmonised process which all ICs use in their reply.
Well, each OC do have their own processes for consensus building already and we can not impose what process one OC use onto another OC. For the implementation phase we do not even know what NTIA imply by "implementation" so the most important thing is for us to know what people mean when they give information. And this is why I am in favor of discussions more than single question/response.
> I therefore support Joe, s views and disagree with your views.
> There is no " I" in our process rather we all should agree
Well, we all must be able to speak as individuals.
You as well as myself.
> Sent from my iPhone
>> On 23 May 2015, at 11:12, joseph alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com> wrote:
>> Do we need any semblance of coherence in how all communities interpret implementation to assure that their responses make sense when conjoined in our proposal?
>>> On 5/23/2015 1:16 AM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>>>> On 23 May 2015, at 6:33, WUKnoben wrote:
>>>> My suggestion is to be a little bit more formal meaning that the ICG letter should be addressed to the chairs of the three OCs since the ICG response to NTIA shall be formal, too.
>>> Although I did say something different in an earlier response, I agree this can be a good alternative.
>>> We as chairs of ICG got the letter, and then the chairs of the OCs can get whatever ICG send.
>>> I just do not feel we ICG should push and force the OCs into some processes that are not needed. I want them to have as much freedom as possible to choose whatever process they want to use to be able to respond to the question.
>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Internal-cg