[Internal-cg] "Implementation"

joseph alhadeff joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com
Sat May 23 09:12:22 UTC 2015


Do we need any semblance of coherence in how all communities interpret 
implementation to assure that their responses make sense when conjoined 
in our proposal?


On 5/23/2015 1:16 AM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> On 23 May 2015, at 6:33, WUKnoben wrote:
>> My suggestion is to be a little bit more formal meaning that the ICG letter should be addressed to the chairs of the three OCs since the ICG response to NTIA shall be formal, too.
> Although I did say something different in an earlier response, I agree this can be a good alternative.
> We as chairs of ICG got the letter, and then the chairs of the OCs can get whatever ICG send.
> I just do not feel we ICG should push and force the OCs into some processes that are not needed. I want them to have as much freedom as possible to choose whatever process they want to use to be able to respond to the question.
>     Patrik
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150523/0c3c4737/attachment.html>

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list