[Internal-cg] Final Published Version of FAQ (.doc & .rtf)

Joseph Alhadeff joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com
Thu Jul 30 10:05:40 UTC 2015


Yes anytime along those lines is fine.

Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)

-----Original Message-----

From: Manal Ismail [manal at tra.gov.eg]
Received: Thursday, 30 Jul 2015, 8:50AM
To: joseph alhadeff [joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com]; internal-cg at ianacg.org [internal-cg at ianacg.org]
Subject: RE: [Internal-cg] Final Published Version of FAQ (.doc & .rtf)

Thanks Joe .. noted .. 

We can use your below sentences in the answer before showing the diagram i.e.: 
Q: How does the overall oversight model of the combined proposal look like? 
A: There is no one overall oversight model. There are three oversight models of the substantive operational parts, also reflecting today's reality. + <show the diagram>

Or re-phrase the question to read:
Q: How do the OCs oversight models look like in the combined final proposal?
A: <show the diagram>

Does any of the above address your concern? or do you have a better formulation in mind?
Please let me know your preference. I'm ok with both but believe the first stresses your point more, by asking a common but inaccurate question and provide the correct accurate answer .. Let me know what you think ..

Kind Regards
--Manal

-----Original Message-----
From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of joseph alhadeff
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 7:51 AM
To: internal-cg at ianacg.org
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Final Published Version of FAQ (.doc & .rtf)

Colleagues:

In phrasing we should be careful not to imply that there is one overall oversight model. there are rather oversight models of the substantive parts, which in reality is today's reality as well.

Joe

On 7/29/2015 9:05 PM, Manal Ismail wrote:
> Many thanks Alissa for your comments ..
>
> All ..
> On a second reading, I suggest adding a question before 21 stating: How does the overall oversight model of the combined proposal look like? (or something along the lines); and provide the modified overall diagram as an answer to this .. Does this make sense?
>
> I suggest this question (20') to be inserted under section VII " About ICG combined proposal public comment period" after renaming it to either:
> - About ICG combined proposal
> or
> - About ICG combined proposal and the public comment period
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> I just didn't want to introduce a question that would affect the numbering of the working version at hand ..
>
> Kind Regards
> --Manal
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alissa Cooper [mailto:alissa at cooperw.in]
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 2:22 AM
> To: Manal Ismail
> Cc: Russ Mundy; Yannis Li; internal-cg at ianacg.org
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Final Published Version of FAQ (.doc & 
> .rtf)
>
> Hi Manal,
>
> Some edits are attached. Overall I think this looks good.
>
> Alissa
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org


_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org


More information about the Internal-cg mailing list