[Internal-cg] Latest version of the combined proposal - v5
Manal Ismail
manal at tra.gov.eg
Sat Jul 25 23:16:45 UTC 2015
Many thanks Joe ..
Please find attached a trial for some closing text as well as some suggested edits ..
@Lynn, please feel free to edit or provide alternative text, as you see appropriate ..
Hope you find this useful ..
Kind Regards
--Manal
-----Original Message-----
From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of Lynn St.Amour
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 6:44 PM
To: joseph alhadeff
Cc: internal-cg at ianacg.org
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Latest version of the combined proposal - v5
Thanks again Joe,
after a quick read, I think this is quite good. It pulls some of the text from the ICG review section (and it fits well here), so we may need to edit that section a bit. I will review again later and attempt to add some closing text per your request.
Also hope to see some other reviewers as well.
Best,
Lynn
On Jul 24, 2015, at 9:29 AM, joseph alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com> wrote:
> Colleagues:
>
> I attach a proposed executive summary. I have drafted a slightly longer stand alone version of the summary sourced from the document. It summarizes process and conclusions. We may wish to add a closing section as it seems to end abruptly?
>
> Happy for any thoughts.
>
> Jennifer, I'm running out to a meeting, could you post the draft executive summary to drop box?
>
> I also attach a first and incomplete draft of what had been a more summarized version, but think that the short version may be best suited to public material or a cover note. I attach it to see if any language could be useful elsewhere...
>
> Joe
>
> On 7/23/2015 11:55 PM, Jennifer Chung wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Attached and linked is v5-MI-LSA-PW-JC. Dropbox link:
>>
>> http://icgsec.asia/1JiezqA
>> . This includes Paul's latest edits as well as the requests from
>> Manal below:
>>
>> "maybe secretariat could kindly assist in inserting the suggested
>> link(s)/footnote(s) (criteria against which the ICG assessed the
>> proposals, individually and collectively) and graph (showing the % of
>> IANA transactions (for 2014) per area) .."
>>
>> Two points relating to Manal/Lynn's request:
>> 1. I have linked to the published ICG proposal finalization process
>>
>> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/iana-transition-assembly-
>> finaliz
>>
>> ation-24dec14-en.pdf. We have not published the individual
>> assessment word template ( http://icgsec.asia/1el3lEA
>> ) on the ICG web site - I can do so if we want to link to this in the
>> ICG report.
>>
>> 2. The data for the chart inserted was taken from pg. 53 of the IANA
>> presentation linked here:
>>
>> https://singapore52.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-iana/presentation-iana-
>> departm
>>
>> ent-11feb15-en.pdf. Lynn/Manal/all, please let me know if this is
>> that is envisaged.
>>
>> Lastly please note that the paragraph numbering is not correct in this file.
>> Once all the edits for the ICG report are in, the Secretariat will
>> merge the ICG report back into the correctly numbered v5.
>>
>> As always, the latest versions of all the public comment related
>> documents for your review is in this Dropbox folder:
>> http://icgsec.asia/1OfxHW2
>>
>>
>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Jennifer
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Internal-cg [
>> mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org
>> ] On Behalf Of Manal
>> Ismail
>> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 9:07 PM
>> To: Lynn St.Amour
>> <lynn at lstamour.org>; internal-cg at ianacg.org
>>
>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Latest version of the combined proposal -
>> v5
>>
>> Many thanks Lynn for the suggested edits and for your comments ..
>> Following your email, I would also urge colleagues to review and
>> provide feedback by Friday in order to meet our public comment period dates ..
>>
>> Meanwhile, for the sake of time, maybe the secretariat could kindly
>> assist in inserting the suggested link(s)/footnote(s) (criteria
>> against which the ICG assessed the proposals, individually and
>> collectively) and graph (showing the % of IANA transactions (for 2014) per area) ..
>>
>> I also believe we need to conclude on the order of the proposals ..
>> Although it is not a substantial change it would still require a
>> thorough review and several edits throughout the document (ICG
>> report, sections' headers, ...) ..
>>
>> I had a few questions throughout the report and hope colleagues would
>> review and provide further guidance ..
>>
>> Finally, some parts of the text (highlighted in blue to my best)
>> reflect the current status of the accountability proposal (ongoing
>> discussions) which won't be the case (accountability proposal
>> finalized and put out for public comments too) by the time the
>> combined transition proposal is out for public comment .. Should such
>> parts be changed to reflect the status of the accountability proposal at the time of the public comment period?
>>
>> Looking forward to receiving your input/feedback/suggestions/comments ..
>>
>> Kind Regards
>> --Manal
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Internal-cg [
>> mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org
>> ] On Behalf Of Lynn
>> St.Amour
>> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 6:54 PM
>> To:
>> internal-cg at ianacg.org
>>
>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Latest version of the combined proposal -
>> v5
>>
>> Again, thanks much Manal,
>>
>> To-date, I reviewed this through the ICG report section (only), and
>> made some edits to try and convey why the report was combined in this
>> way. I would appreciate it if folks could review it carefully, as I
>> believe it is a critical point (and sensitive). And, some of it may
>> be better suited to the Exec. Summary.
>>
>> Joe, I believe you had volunteered to send some draft text re the Exec.
>> summary. If this is correct, can I do anything to help? If I have
>> it wrong, I will look up the minutes (can't do that just now though,
>> unfortunately).
>>
>> And, could those individuals who have been participating in the CWG -
>> Stewardship and the CCWG efforts, please review the appropriate
>> sections to ensure they reflect the latest positions?
>>
>> Finally, we should aim to have all comments on this and the public
>> web-site no later than this Friday, so that we can review the "very near final"
>> drafts of this on Monday, in order to meet our public comment period
>> timetable of July 31st.
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> Lynn
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
> <Exec summary rev1.doc><cover letter - Executive Summary.doc>
_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Exec summary rev1-MI.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 46592 bytes
Desc: Exec summary rev1-MI.doc
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150725/2d5e8657/attachment.doc>
More information about the Internal-cg
mailing list