[Internal-cg] Thoughts on proposal assessments

[Manal Ismail]

Don't we want to seek CWG input on this? 
How do they plan to approve the CCWG proposal? Is it just an announcement or is there something that needs to be reflected in their final proposal, edits?/references? By ICG?/CWG?

The names community proposal states:
" Accountability recommendations, if implemented as envisaged, will meet the requirements that the CWG-Stewardship has previously communicated to the CCWG. If any element of these ICANN level accountability mechanisms is not implemented as contemplated by the CWG-Stewardship proposal, this CWG-Stewardship proposal will require revision."

Does this mean that if everything is implemented the final version stands as it is?

Kind Regards
--Manal

-----Original Message-----
From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of Patrik Fältström
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 1:10 AM
To: Alissa Cooper
Cc: IANA etc etc Coordination Group
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Thoughts on proposal assessments

On 9 Jul 2015, at 21:01, Alissa Cooper wrote:

>> This is mistaken because the CCWG's work (workstream 1) will be formally incorporated into the CWG proposal.
>> NTIA has made it clear that they are basically part of the same proposal, and we are responsible for sending them to NTIA.
>
> I do not believe that is the plan actually. I thought they will remain two separate documents and while they will both be transmitted to NTIA via the ICANN Board, they will not be incorporated into a single document or even necessarily transmitted at the same time or in the same communication between the Board and NTIA.

Speaking personally, I have always expected the possibility of references between the two documents, but never that one was incorporated into the other. ICG and CCWG [work stream 1] are parallell processes. Not one being the parent of the other.

Two documents that are submitted to NTIA.

Nothing more, nothing less.

   Patrik