[Internal-cg] Face 2 face Dublin

[Milton L Mueller]

I don't know if I have formally noted that I will need travel support to Dublin. 

--MM

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of
> Patrik Fältström
> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 1:33 PM
> To: Alissa Cooper
> Cc: ICG Coordination Group
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Face 2 face Dublin
> 
> I also did not want to start too early Sat to give the ability for people to
> arrive Sat morning.
> 
>    Patrik
> 
> On 10 Jul 2015, at 19:10, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> 
> > Sounds good. Not everyone will be able to make both Saturday and
> Sunday, but hopefully everyone can make it to one or the other.
> >
> > On Jul 10, 2015, at 8:11 AM, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:
> >
> >> Given the indication from many that Sunday might be busy for them,
> what about the following adjustment to the proposal from Alissa:
> >>
> >> - Saturday before ICANN week, 13-17
> >> - Sunday before ICANN week, 9-12
> >> - Thursday just before or just after lunch, sync with CCWG
> >> - Friday 9-17
> >>
> >> Patrik
> >>
> >> On 7 Jul 2015, at 20:03, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> >>
> >>> My suggestion would be that we plan to meet for:
> >>>
> >>> - a couple of hours at the beginning of the ICANN week (Sunday?) in case
> we have any final tasks to do related to the proposal or prep for the week
> ahead.
> >>> - a working session on the Thursday of ICANN week, similar to what we
> did in BA (but hopefully after the CCWG’s last session) to possibly conclude
> our work and decide that we’re ready to submit the proposal.
> >>> - a half or full day on Friday after the ICANN meeting is over, in case we
> don’t actually finish during the week and need time to work more on the
> proposal. Or if we do finish during the week, we could use a little time to
> discuss communications needs and the ICG’s role while awaiting USG review
> and implementation finalization.
> >>>
> >>> Alissa
> >>>
> >>> On Jul 6, 2015, at 10:44 PM, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Let me ask a followup question which I forgot to ask, and this not only
> to you Russ:
> >>>>
> >>>> What do you think should be on the agenda?
> >>>>
> >>>> Patrik
> >>>>
> >>>> On 7 Jul 2015, at 4:58, Russ Housley wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I think the ICG should meet after the ICANN meeting.  The ICG needs
> to know that the CCWG-Accountability work has achieved consensus and
> that it meets all of the requirements for the proposal in hand.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Russ
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Jul 6, 2015, at 9:10 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> All,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We have moved back and forth between meeting before and after
> the ICANN meeting. For the previous meeting we decided to meet before,
> but have a "followup meeting" on the Thursday of ICANN week. We could
> also do the reverse, one short prep-meeting and then actual work after the
> ICANN meeting.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Question from me is whether you, given the timeline, believe we
> should meet before or after.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Can you all think about what you believe would be the best?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We need to decide shortly.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Patrik Fältström
> >>>>>> Co-Chair
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Internal-cg mailing list
> >>>>>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> >>>>>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Internal-cg mailing list
> >>>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> >>>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org