[Internal-cg] Face 2 face Dublin

[Patrik Fältström]

I also did not want to start too early Sat to give the ability for people to arrive Sat morning.

   Patrik

On 10 Jul 2015, at 19:10, Alissa Cooper wrote:

> Sounds good. Not everyone will be able to make both Saturday and Sunday, but hopefully everyone can make it to one or the other.
>
> On Jul 10, 2015, at 8:11 AM, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:
>
>> Given the indication from many that Sunday might be busy for them, what about the following adjustment to the proposal from Alissa:
>>
>> - Saturday before ICANN week, 13-17
>> - Sunday before ICANN week, 9-12
>> - Thursday just before or just after lunch, sync with CCWG
>> - Friday 9-17
>>
>> Patrik
>>
>> On 7 Jul 2015, at 20:03, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>>
>>> My suggestion would be that we plan to meet for:
>>>
>>> - a couple of hours at the beginning of the ICANN week (Sunday?) in case we have any final tasks to do related to the proposal or prep for the week ahead.
>>> - a working session on the Thursday of ICANN week, similar to what we did in BA (but hopefully after the CCWG’s last session) to possibly conclude our work and decide that we’re ready to submit the proposal.
>>> - a half or full day on Friday after the ICANN meeting is over, in case we don’t actually finish during the week and need time to work more on the proposal. Or if we do finish during the week, we could use a little time to discuss communications needs and the ICG’s role while awaiting USG review and implementation finalization.
>>>
>>> Alissa
>>>
>>> On Jul 6, 2015, at 10:44 PM, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Let me ask a followup question which I forgot to ask, and this not only to you Russ:
>>>>
>>>> What do you think should be on the agenda?
>>>>
>>>> Patrik
>>>>
>>>> On 7 Jul 2015, at 4:58, Russ Housley wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think the ICG should meet after the ICANN meeting.  The ICG needs to know that the CCWG-Accountability work has achieved consensus and that it meets all of the requirements for the proposal in hand.
>>>>>
>>>>> Russ
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 6, 2015, at 9:10 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have moved back and forth between meeting before and after the ICANN meeting. For the previous meeting we decided to meet before, but have a "followup meeting" on the Thursday of ICANN week. We could also do the reverse, one short prep-meeting and then actual work after the ICANN meeting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Question from me is whether you, given the timeline, believe we should meet before or after.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you all think about what you believe would be the best?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We need to decide shortly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patrik Fältström
>>>>>> Co-Chair
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>>>>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>>>>>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>>>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150710/d13afe93/attachment.asc>