[Internal-cg] Thoughts on proposal assessments

[Elise Gerich]

Wolf-Ulrich,
We are following the assessment of the various proposals and are curious as
to what the final impact will be on our current operational structure and
the interdependencies of the functions.
-- Elise 


From:  WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
Reply-To:  WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
Date:  Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 2:21 AM
To:  "kuoweiwu at gmail.com" <kuoweiwu at gmail.com>, Alissa Cooper
<alissa at cooperw.in>
Cc:  "internal-cg at ianacg.org" <internal-cg at ianacg.org>
Subject:  Re: [Internal-cg] Thoughts on proposal assessments

> Kuo-Wei,
> 
> I'm glad you raising this point. I've already raised my finger several times
> in various meetings - including the CSG meeting with the board in BA - in
> order not to forget the people in the present and future IANA organisation.
> They are the ones who ensure continuous operational excellence which is
> crucial with regards to the security, stability and resiliency of the
> system - one of the basic NTIA requirements.
> Career plan of staff is one element between others.
> I would encourage to outreach at an appropriate time. Maybe Elise as staff
> liaison could gide us.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> From: Wu Kuo-Wei
> Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 4:45 PM
> To: Alissa Cooper
> Cc: ICG Coordination Group
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Thoughts on proposal assessments
> 
> If I may, I like to speak in my personal capacity. If you don’t agree the
> liaison’s position proper to say anything, you can drop my comment.
> 
>>  Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in> 於 2015年7月8日 06:35 寫道：
>> 
>>  Thank you to everyone who did a names proposal assessment. I wrote down a
>>  few thoughts in preparation for our discussion on July 8.
>> 
>>  Both Alan and the names folks (Wolf-Ulrich, Mary, Keith, and Martin) point
>>  out that there are areas where more detail will be developed as part of
>>  implementation (service levels, IANA budget, PTI budget, etc.). It would
>>  be helpful for us to have the definitive list of these for our reference.
>>  Is that list somewhere in the proposal (or supporting material)?
> 
> It could be part of implementation. But as name proposal, it try to separate
> the policy and operator to establish PTI. We might need to get some input
> from IANA people who will be moved to PTI as name proposal (as the long term
> stability issue of PTI). It is critical for such design working well for the
> career development for IANA people in the long run. At the current status,
> IANA people can move to other department of ICANN for better career plan,
> and receiving reasonable promotion. We (ICG and ICANN) might need to learn
> IANA people, not just treat them as “box”. We decide their future, but
> ignore their voice. So I will suggest to add this into the list other than
> SLA, budget,..).
> 
> Again, if you don’t agree the liaison position proper to say, please drop my
> comment.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Kuo Wu
> 
>> 
>>  Alan, Russ Housley and Russ Mundy point out that the proposal cannot be
>>  considered complete since it is dependent on outputs from the CCWG. My
>>  question: does that prevent us in the ICG from moving forward with public
>>  comment and proposal finalization while we await the output of the CCWG?
>>  My personal view is that it does not but I wanted to check.
>> 
>>  Russ Mundy raises a good question about the Root Zone Maintainer’s
>>  relationship to the IFO and I look forward to our discussion of that. I
>>  note that the SSAC made a similar comment to the CWG in its approval of
>>  the proposal. Again I don’t think this is necessarily blocking on our
>>  work, but it might be a detail where we need to seek clarification.
>> 
>>  Alissa
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Internal-cg mailing list
>>  Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>>  http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150709/69370308/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5037 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150709/69370308/attachment.p7s>