[Internal-cg] Face 2 face Dublin
Paul Wilson
pwilson at apnic.net
Wed Jul 8 04:55:34 UTC 2015
I agree.
Hope we can confirm the Sunday timing soon.
Also, I suggest to schedule for a full day on Friday.
Paul.
On 8 Jul 2015, at 4:03, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> My suggestion would be that we plan to meet for:
>
> - a couple of hours at the beginning of the ICANN week (Sunday?) in
> case we have any final tasks to do related to the proposal or prep for
> the week ahead.
> - a working session on the Thursday of ICANN week, similar to what we
> did in BA (but hopefully after the CCWG’s last session) to possibly
> conclude our work and decide that we’re ready to submit the
> proposal.
> - a half or full day on Friday after the ICANN meeting is over, in
> case we don’t actually finish during the week and need time to work
> more on the proposal. Or if we do finish during the week, we could use
> a little time to discuss communications needs and the ICG’s role
> while awaiting USG review and implementation finalization.
>
> Alissa
>
> On Jul 6, 2015, at 10:44 PM, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se>
> wrote:
>
>> Let me ask a followup question which I forgot to ask, and this not
>> only to you Russ:
>>
>> What do you think should be on the agenda?
>>
>> Patrik
>>
>> On 7 Jul 2015, at 4:58, Russ Housley wrote:
>>
>>> I think the ICG should meet after the ICANN meeting. The ICG needs
>>> to know that the CCWG-Accountability work has achieved consensus and
>>> that it meets all of the requirements for the proposal in hand.
>>>
>>> Russ
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 6, 2015, at 9:10 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> We have moved back and forth between meeting before and after the
>>>> ICANN meeting. For the previous meeting we decided to meet before,
>>>> but have a "followup meeting" on the Thursday of ICANN week. We
>>>> could also do the reverse, one short prep-meeting and then actual
>>>> work after the ICANN meeting.
>>>>
>>>> Question from me is whether you, given the timeline, believe we
>>>> should meet before or after.
>>>>
>>>> Can you all think about what you believe would be the best?
>>>>
>>>> We need to decide shortly.
>>>>
>>>> Patrik Fältström
>>>> Co-Chair
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>>>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
________________________________________________________________________
Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC dg at apnic.net
http://www.apnic.net @apnicdg
More information about the Internal-cg
mailing list