[Internal-cg] Face 2 face Dublin

[Milton L Mueller]

Agree with this plan. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of Keith
> Davidson
> Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2015 3:11 PM
> To: internal-cg at ianacg.org
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Face 2 face Dublin
> 
> Fully support this plan.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Keith
> 
> On 8/07/2015 6:03 a.m., Alissa Cooper wrote:
> > My suggestion would be that we plan to meet for:
> >
> > - a couple of hours at the beginning of the ICANN week (Sunday?) in case
> we have any final tasks to do related to the proposal or prep for the week
> ahead.
> > - a working session on the Thursday of ICANN week, similar to what we did
> in BA (but hopefully after the CCWG's last session) to possibly conclude our
> work and decide that we're ready to submit the proposal.
> > - a half or full day on Friday after the ICANN meeting is over, in case we
> don't actually finish during the week and need time to work more on the
> proposal. Or if we do finish during the week, we could use a little time to
> discuss communications needs and the ICG's role while awaiting USG review
> and implementation finalization.
> >
> > Alissa
> >
> > On Jul 6, 2015, at 10:44 PM, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:
> >
> >> Let me ask a followup question which I forgot to ask, and this not only to
> you Russ:
> >>
> >> What do you think should be on the agenda?
> >>
> >>    Patrik
> >>
> >> On 7 Jul 2015, at 4:58, Russ Housley wrote:
> >>
> >>> I think the ICG should meet after the ICANN meeting.  The ICG needs to
> know that the CCWG-Accountability work has achieved consensus and that it
> meets all of the requirements for the proposal in hand.
> >>>
> >>> Russ
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Jul 6, 2015, at 9:10 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> All,
> >>>>
> >>>> We have moved back and forth between meeting before and after the
> ICANN meeting. For the previous meeting we decided to meet before, but
> have a "followup meeting" on the Thursday of ICANN week. We could also
> do the reverse, one short prep-meeting and then actual work after the
> ICANN meeting.
> >>>>
> >>>> Question from me is whether you, given the timeline, believe we
> should meet before or after.
> >>>>
> >>>> Can you all think about what you believe would be the best?
> >>>>
> >>>> We need to decide shortly.
> >>>>
> >>>> Patrik Fältström
> >>>> Co-Chair
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Internal-cg mailing list
> >>>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> >>>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Internal-cg mailing list
> >> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> >> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Internal-cg mailing list
> > Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> > http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> > .
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org