[Internal-cg] Questions from webinars

[Joseph Alhadeff]

Is this a question we should pose to the OCs? If there is a need for some cross OC coordination review in the case of the replacement of the Operator?  This would have been beyond the remit of the individual proposal...

Sent from my iPad

> On Aug 20, 2015, at 7:31 PM, Mohamed El Bashir <mbashir at mbash.net> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Lynn for the draft answer, Alan formulation is good.
> 
> My concern is the last part of the answer :" including choosing/changing the IANA functions operator for their part of the IANA functions", I am not disputing the OC right to make such decisions based on the results of its evaluation of IFO performance for their related functions,  But I am a bit concerned regarding the possibility of one OC changing/splitting the IANA functions unilaterally in the absence of a proper coordination mechanism, such a change might impact the stability and security of the Internet ( not fulfilling one of NTIA requirements ).
> 
> As our mandate is to produce a harmonized combined final proposal, shouldn't we consider the unity of IANA function is an objective and propose mechanism/rules that ensure proper implementation of IFO change if it happened.
> 
> Kind Regards,
> Mohamed
> 
> ( sent from a tablet device apologies for any misspellings)
> 
>> On Aug 20, 2015, at 8:34 PM, Mueller, Milton L <milton.mueller at pubpolicy.gatech.edu> wrote:
>> 
>> I like Alan's reformulation too.
>> --MM
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> helpful.  Alan, I think your reformulation adds a lot of clarity to the original
>>> question, and helps to clarify the respective roles of the 3 OCs.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org