[Internal-cg] Questions from webinars

[Drazek, Keith]

I support Milton's proposed edit.

Regards,
Keith Drazek

Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 14, 2015, at 9:43 PM, Mueller, Milton L <milton.mueller at pubpolicy.gatech.edu> wrote:
> 
> Looks OK to me. 
> If it's not too much of a nit, I would change the opening of the 6th question as follows:
> 
> Yours: As noted before, the US government no longer has root zone change approval authority or contracting authority over ICANN.
> 
> Proposed: As noted before, the US government will no longer have root zone change approval authority or contracting authority over ICANN when the transition is complete.
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of Lynn
>> St.Amour
>> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 1:15 PM
>> To: internal-cg at ianacg.org
>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Questions from webinars
>> Importance: High
>> 
>> Dear ICG members,
>> 
>> Thank you to all those who have reviewed these FAQs.  In the attached
>> document, I accepted all those changes, and believe there is only one
>> remaining area needing review.   The response to the question:  "How is PTI
>> different from the current IANA department?" was very focused on the
>> naming functions while not making that explicit.  I added a few lines to try and
>> clarify that (virtually all from the various proposals) and to include all the OC
>> proposals.
>> 
>> A quick review would be very helpful and once we have agreement, I will work
>> with the secretariat to get these posted.  Hopefully very soon, given the>> comment period is well underway.
>> 
>> Also posted to Dropbox
>> 
>> Best,
>> Lynn
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>