[Internal-cg] Questions from webinars
Mueller, Milton L
milton.mueller at pubpolicy.gatech.edu
Fri Aug 14 19:43:25 UTC 2015
Looks OK to me.
If it's not too much of a nit, I would change the opening of the 6th question as follows:
Yours: As noted before, the US government no longer has root zone change approval authority or contracting authority over ICANN.
Proposed: As noted before, the US government will no longer have root zone change approval authority or contracting authority over ICANN when the transition is complete.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of Lynn
> St.Amour
> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 1:15 PM
> To: internal-cg at ianacg.org
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Questions from webinars
> Importance: High
>
> Dear ICG members,
>
> Thank you to all those who have reviewed these FAQs. In the attached
> document, I accepted all those changes, and believe there is only one
> remaining area needing review. The response to the question: "How is PTI
> different from the current IANA department?" was very focused on the
> naming functions while not making that explicit. I added a few lines to try and
> clarify that (virtually all from the various proposals) and to include all the OC
> proposals.
>
> A quick review would be very helpful and once we have agreement, I will work
> with the secretariat to get these posted. Hopefully very soon, given the
> comment period is well underway.
>
> Also posted to Dropbox
>
> Best,
> Lynn
More information about the Internal-cg
mailing list