[Internal-cg] Response to Richard Hill

[Russ Mundy]

Alissa,

This response certainly sounds reasonable to me.  I did note a couple of grammatical/typo type nits that I’ve noted inline.  

Russ M 

On Aug 11, 2015, at 5:41 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in> wrote:

> All,
> 
> Here is a proposed response to this comment. What do you think?
> 
> Alissa
> 
> ----
> 
> Dear Richard,
> 
> Thank you for submitting your comments to the ICG. We note your view on the process for consensus in CWG Stewardship for the document produced.
> The ICG also notes that the CWG Stewardship has taken notice of your view as explained in email from Lise Fuhr that can be found here: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/2015-August/004054.html>.
> 
> The ICG evaluation of how the CWG Stewardship process meets the NTIA requirements is in the ICG document that is out for open consultation as explained here: <https://www.ianacg.org/calls-for-input/combined-proposal-public-comment-period/>.
> 
> Regrading the specific question on what is the basis for ICG to evaluate comments addressed to the

Regarding

> operational communities, please have a look at section 2a in the ICG comments handling process <https://www.ianacg.org/icg-files/documents/Community-Comments-Handling-1May15-final.pdf>, which says "ICG in its discretion will raise the issues or question to the relevant OC with a request that they provide a timely and appropriate reply." This was exactly what ICG did.
> 
> In general the ICG had the ability at any time to make a statement as long as we fulfil our mandate and

                                 has

> charter. Furthermore, the original comments posted in the ICG Forum were not addressed to the CWG Stewardship but instead addressed to the ICG, and because of that the ICG did take action.
> 
> Kind Regards,
>  
> Alissa Cooper on behalf of the ICG
> 
> 
> On Aug 7, 2015, at 3:00 AM, Jennifer Chung <jen at icgsec.asia> wrote:
> 
>> Dear All,
>>  
>> The following comment has been posted to the ICG Forum today:
>>  
>> 7 August – “Comment on handling of my previous comment on the CWG-Stewardship proposal” from Richard Hill.
>>  
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/icg-forum_ianacg.org/2015-August/000003.html
>>  
>> Best Regards,
>>  
>> Jennifer
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150812/36bcdc29/attachment.html>