[Internal-cg] Overlaps/implications of CWG proposal for RIRs/IETF

Mary Uduma mnuduma at yahoo.com
Tue Apr 28 18:11:46 UTC 2015

Thanks Alissa.Very helpful answer. Hopefully, Alan would comment as well.
Mary Uduma

     On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 4:10 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in> wrote:

 Hi Mary,
One response below.
On Apr 26, 2015, at 7:56 AM, Mary Uduma <mnuduma at yahoo.com> wrote:

Dear All,
Thank you Alissa and those that have commented on this thread. I support the direction of the Chair as a proactive move.  
I also agree with Patrik's proposition.
However, I have the following questions for ICG  members in the  Protocol Parameters and the Number Communities regarding the Naming proposal on IANA function operator in the post transition.
Has ICANN Liaisons to any of the two OCs, the MOUs  not withstanding? 

ICANN appoints an IANA liaison to the IETF. The IETF appoints a liaison to the ICANN Board, two technical experts to the ICANN Technical Liaisons Group, and one voting member of the ICANN Nomcom. As far as I know the governing documents that created these positions are entirely separate from the IANA-related MOU.
Perhaps Alan or Paul can answer for the RIRs.
I didn’t add the question above to the draft note to the communities as it seems more like a factual question about existing practice than a question related to the CWG proposal. But please correct me if I misunderstood.

Can the two OCs  be willing to part-own the PTI instead of it being wholly owned by ICANN and other OCs just having a liaison to its Board? Though not yet concluded.
Are there any legal, statutory or jurisdictional restrictions for doing so?

Mary Uduma



  On Saturday, April 25, 2015 2:53 PM, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:

 On 25 Apr 2015, at 15:38, Jon Nevett wrote:

> I don't support the addition in which we suggest a different jurisdiction.


Once again, we as ICG should not and can not propose any specific solution or changes. If ICG members or their organizations do have specific views, by all means do submit such things via whatever mechanism the OC have suggested.

  Best, Patrik
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org


Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150428/7037d6e4/attachment.html>

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list