[Internal-cg] ICG minutes to be approved (6 Feb, 11 Mar)

Mary Uduma mnuduma at yahoo.com
Sun Apr 19 03:49:53 UTC 2015

Dear All,I am fine with the minutes and have no objections to approving them.

     On Saturday, April 18, 2015 8:43 PM, Lynn St.Amour <Lynn at LStAmour.org> wrote:

 Thank you Jennifer,

A couple of minor edits to help the clarity of:  Section 5. Status for Protocol Parameters Proposal (not wishing to put words into Jari's mouth but…)

Old:  "Arkko reported that there for the most parts, very board agreement or even unanimous opinion during the proposal process."

Suggested: "Arkko reported that there was for the most part, very broad or even unanimous agreement during the proposal process."

Otherwise, I am fine with both sets of minutes.

Thank you,


On Apr 16, 2015, at 3:28 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in> wrote:

> All,
> I’d like to get these minutes approved. Please send any edits to the list by April 20 at 20:00 UTC.
> Thanks,
> Alissa
> On Apr 8, 2015, at 8:46 AM, Jennifer Chung <jen at icgsec.asia> wrote:
>> Dear All,
>> In continuation of the previous minutes approval, attached please find the following for your review:
>> 1.      6 Feb minutes v5: https://www.dropbox.com/s/qw68qd2zxntuq3o/minutes-fourth-f2f-meeting-day1-6-february-2015-v5.docx?dl=0
>> -          I have accepted Milton’s edits to the pg. 4 first bullet point under “Discussion” since there were no oppositions to his wording.
>> o  “Some ICG members raised questions about the statement that the current ICANN-IETF MoU "does not specify a jurisdiction" and asked for clarification regarding the legal status of the MoU.”
>> -          I have also reverted pg. 4 section 6 second bullet point, first sentence back to Daniel’s suggestion as agreed to in the chat log by Milton from this morning’s call.
>> o  "Wilson described that the numbers proposal was generated by the CRISP team based on open, transparent and inclusive community discussions in all five regions and that it represented the consensus built from these discussions in an open, transparent [and thoroughly documented] process." – language and link in the [] added by the Secretariat for additional information.
>> 2.      11 Mar minutes v3: https://www.dropbox.com/s/cckhjdb1oeyjlz2/minutes-teleconference-11-march-2015-draft-v3.docx?dl=0
>> -          Edits from Lynn have been incorporated into v3.
>> -          Redlined sections on pg. 3 section 3 are edits the Secretariat has made to Mary’s additional language and needs approval from Mary/all.
>> Please let me know if there are any questions.
>> Best Regards,
>> Jennifer
>> <minutes-fourth-f2f-meeting-day1-6-february-2015-v5.docx><minutes-teleconference-11-march-2015-draft-v3.docx>_______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at ianacg.org
>> http://ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org

Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150419/e4384038/attachment.html>

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list