[Internal-cg] Proposal approval and agenda for call #26[WARNING: ATTACHMENT UNSCANNED]

[Manal Ismail]

Thanks Joe .. Much better .. I also did not like 'approve' ..
Kind Regards
--Manal

From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Alhadeff
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 11:27 AM
To: internal-cg at ianacg.org
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Proposal approval and agenda for call #26[WARNING: ATTACHMENT UNSCANNED]

Colleagues:

should the latter point be phrased:

With the confirmation of the all the Operational Communities that no further dependencies need to be addressed, ICG affirms that it has found that the combined proposals and all the related processes have met the criteria laid out in our charter and mandate, including the relevant NTIA criteria, and on this basis we transmit this proposal to the ICANN Board for submission to NTIA.

I don't like the construction of "we approved"...

Joe
On 3/1/2016 1:29 AM, Manal Ismail wrote:
Many thanks Alissa for sharing this version in advance of the call .. All looks good to me ..

I did 2 minor edits but have no strong position on any of them .. Edits are attached in track changes, available on Dropbox and underlined below for everyone's convenience:

Para X018 -> now X016:
Many commenters in the public comment period noted the CWG dependency on ICANN-level accountability mechanisms that were, at the time of the public comment period, under development in the CCWG and noted the associated difficulty in judging the overall accountability provided by the Names proposal.
Rationale: this part of the sentence is now too far and I think we need to link it back to what the commenters 'noted'.

Paras 112 and X031 -> now X029:
"The ICG unanimously supports this proposal and recommends that all affected parties implement it. The ICG approved this version and agreed to submitting it to NTIA via the ICANN Board."
Rationale: this was mentioned somewhere in the deleted text .. I feel it's worth mentioning .. not necessarily here if there's a better place ..

Looking forward to our call later today ..

Kind Regards
--Manal

-----Original Message-----
From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of Alissa Cooper
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 6:48 PM
To: IANA etc etcCoordination Group
Subject: [Internal-cg] Proposal approval and agenda for call #26[WARNING: ATTACHMENT UNSCANNED]

Dear all,

We have received confirmation from the CWG that the CCWG proposal meets its requirements. Therefore, we are now in a position to approve our final proposal for transmission to NTIA via the ICANN Board. The final proposal, with edits made to the sections that previously referenced the CWG-CCWG dependency, is attached to this message in redline and clean form. They are also available on Dropbox:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/0lzepe727bxqz20/IANA-transition-proposal-v10.docx?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/j65tohvyy59ellt/IANA-transition-proposal-v10-clean.docx?dl=0

We will ask for the ICG's approval of this final version on our March 1 call (12:00 UTC). Here is the proposed agenda for the call:

1. Approval of final transition proposal 2. Update on communications plans

Feedback on the agenda is welcome.

Alissa






_______________________________________________

Internal-cg mailing list

Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org<mailto:Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org>

http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20160301/834ffe2f/attachment.html>