[Internal-cg] Proposal approval and agenda for call #26

[James M. Bladel]

Speaking for myself, my preferences would be:

(1) yes, and

(2) upon confirmation that the CCWG Proposal from (1) has been approved by
the Chartering Organizations and transmitted to the Board.

Thanks‹

J.


On 2/29/16, 17:58 , "Internal-cg on behalf of Alissa Cooper"
<internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org on behalf of alissa at cooperw.in> wrote:

>To alleviate potential confusion, I would like for us to handle separate
>issues separately on the call:
>
>(1) Do we approve of the final text in v10 of the transition proposal?
>That is, if nothing changes in the CCWG proposal and all of the
>chartering organizations approve it, is v10 the version we will send to
>the Board?
>
>(2) If we answer (1) in the affirmative, when can we send v10 to the
>Board? (This may be where the disagreement on this thread is arising, or
>at least I hope it is here and not in (1)).
>
>Alissa
>
>> On Feb 29, 2016, at 3:32 PM, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu>
>>wrote:
>> 
>> I agree with Martin.
>> The CWG says that its proposal is dependent on the CCWG and until the
>>CCWG is done the CWG is not done and we are not done.
>> We gain nothing by jumping the gun
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of
>>> Martin Boyle
>>> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 2:32 PM
>>> To: Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>
>>> Cc: IANA etc etcCoordination Group <internal-cg at ianacg.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Proposal approval and agenda for call #26
>>> 
>>> Hi Alissa,
>>> 
>>> Surely the accountability requirements will only be met if the CCWG-
>>> Accountability proposal is adopted?  Until then it is a conditional
>>>agreement:
>>> if the draft proposal were to be adopted, it would meet the CWG-
>>> Stewardship's requirements.  Put another way, if one or more Chartering
>>> Organisation were to reject (or, for that matter, the ICANN Board
>>>refused to
>>> adopt) there is no CCWG-Accountability proposal and therefore the
>>> conditionality has not been met.
>>> 
>>> We'll look silly if we send in the proposal a day or so before one of
>>>the
>>> Chartering Organisations rejected the draft...
>>> 
>>> Martin
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Alissa Cooper [mailto:alissa at cooperw.in]
>>> Sent: 29 February 2016 17:59
>>> To: Martin Boyle <Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk>
>>> Cc: IANA etc etcCoordination Group <internal-cg at ianacg.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Proposal approval and agenda for call #26
>>> 
>>> Hi Martin,
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 29, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Martin Boyle <Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Don't we need to wait for the Chartering Organisations to adopt?
>>> 
>>> No. The ICG proposal is explicit about this (on the front page and in
>>>every
>>> highlighted section). What we were waiting for was the CWG¹s
>>>confirmation,
>>> and we received that. Our proposal was not conditioned on any action
>>>by the
>>> chartering organizations.
>>> 
>>> Alissa
>>> 
>>>> Many a slip and all that...  It is only a draft until then.  The
>>>>CWG-Stewardship
>>> endorsement is an important, but not a complete, condition.
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of
>>> Alissa Cooper
>>>> Sent: 29 February 2016 16:48
>>>> To: IANA etc etcCoordination Group <internal-cg at ianacg.org>
>>>> Subject: [Internal-cg] Proposal approval and agenda for call #26
>>>> 
>>>> Dear all,
>>>> 
>>>> We have received confirmation from the CWG that the CCWG proposal
>>> meets its requirements. Therefore, we are now in a position to approve
>>>our
>>> final proposal for transmission to NTIA via the ICANN Board. The final
>>> proposal, with edits made to the sections that previously referenced
>>>the
>>> CWG-CCWG dependency, is attached to this message in redline and clean
>>> form. They are also available on Dropbox:
>>>> 
>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/0lzepe727bxqz20/IANA-transition-proposal-
>>> v10.docx?dl=0
>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/j65tohvyy59ellt/IANA-transition-proposal-
>>> v10-clean.docx?dl=0
>>>> 
>>>> We will ask for the ICG¹s approval of this final version on our March
>>>>1 call
>>> (12:00 UTC). Here is the proposed agenda for the call:
>>>> 
>>>> 1. Approval of final transition proposal 2. Update on communications
>>>>plans
>>>> 
>>>> Feedback on the agenda is welcome.
>>>> 
>>>> Alissa
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Internal-cg mailing list
>Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org